GST

Allahabad HC directs action against Joint Commissioner Sales tax Azamgarh for not complying with orders

Allahabad High Court ask Govt. to take action against Joint Commissioner Sales tax Azamgarh for not complying with order.

He has even no minimum courtesy as to how he should appear before the Court, remarked the High Court

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2433 (2018) 07 HC

The Hon’ble High Court was hearing a Sales/Trade Tax Revision Petition filed by the  Commissioner, Commercial Tax, UP against the order passed by the Commercial Tax Tribunal Bench, Varanasi. 

In the previous hearing the Hon’ble High Court had observed that no proper explanation had been offered by the revisionist with regard to delay in filing the present revision. The delay was attributed to shortage of employees in the Commercial Tax Department, excess work over Goods and Services Tax and performing duties in election and in the examination of Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad to control copying in the examination and in performing duty in peaceful organization and being on duty as seeking Sector Magistrate.

This Hon’ble High Court was informed that the proposal letter (undated) issued by the Joint Commissioner (Executive) Commercial Tax, Azamgarh Region Azamgarh had been received in the office of Additional Commissioner, High Court (works) at Allahabad after 18 months from the date of the order impugned.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that there was no explanation offerred nor it was indicated even in the letter issued by the Joint Commissioner (Executive) Commercial Tax, Azamgarh Region Azamgarh and the letter itself was undated with regard to delay. 
The Hon’ble High Court opined that Prima facie it appeared that due to negligence on the part of the Joint Commissioner the delay had caused.

It was noted that in another case also, related to the same Joint Commissioner the Court had noticed that for the delay, a similar type of explanation had been offered.

In view of the above, the Hon’ble High Court had passed order calling for a personal affidavit from the said Joint Commissioner Azamgarh explaining the cause and reasons of delay in filing the revisions. It was also directed that on next date fixed, the Joint Commissioner Azamgarh shall also be personally present before the Court and explain the reasons.

However, when the case was taken up on the next listing, though the said Joint Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Azamgarh was present in the Court, His Lordship observed that he had even no minimum courtesy as to how he should appear before the Court. He was wearing a jeans paint. Also, he had not even complied with the Court’s order nor any affidavit had been filed in pursuance of the previous order.

When the Hon’ble High Court asked the said Jt. Commissioner in what time he will comply the order, he said that he was busy at present and at least one months’ time be allowed to him. He stated that he had a lot of other work therefore he could not comply the order of the High Court.

In view of the aforesaid reasons, the Hon’ble High Court passed order and directed the commissioner, Commercial Tax/Principal Secretary, Service Tax, Government of U.P. to take appropriate action against the said Joint Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Azamgarh and pass an appropriate orders in accordance with law.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as AO failed to mention the relevant clause the case fall

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as AO failed to mention under which clause the case of the assessee fall. In a…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income by deploying ex-servicemen as security guards not business activity

Income of section 25 company by deploying ex-servicemen as security guards was not business activity. In a recent judgment, Kerala…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Draft assessment order cannot give rise to any enforceable demand 

In absence of a valid final assessment order passed within statutory time frame, draft assessment order cannot give rise to…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B if expenditure not claimed in Profit and Loss Account

No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

4 days ago