CBIC amends class of registered persons for the purpose of e-invoice
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2020
G.S.R…..(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 48 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Government,on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendments in notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.13/2020 –Central Tax, dated the 21st March, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i),vide number G.S.R. 196(E), dated the 21st March, 2020, namely:–
In the said notification, in the first paragraph,
(i) before the words “those referred to in sub-rules”, the words “a Special Economic Zone unit and” shall be inserted;
(ii) for the words “one hundred crore rupees”, the words “five hundred crore rupees” shall be substituted.
[F. No. CBEC-20/13/01/2019-GST]
(Pramod Kumar) Director, Government of India
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide notification No. 13/2020-Central Tax, dated the 21st March, 2020, published vide number G.S.R. 196(E), dated the 21st March, 2020.
ITAT allows depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi allows depreciation on highway…
Once assessee satisfies conditions mentioned in section 270AA, the Assessing Officer would be bound to grant immunity In a recent…
NTPC invited applications from CA/CMA as young professionals to join NTPC Projects/Stations as Executive Trainee, Finance. NTPC Limited has invited…
Allahabad High Court disposes GST appeals observing that the functioning of GST Appellate Tribunal are put to motion Allahabad High…
Date of dispatch of notice as per ITBA portal and date of communication by email may not necessarily be the…
In a recent judgment, Bombay High Court held that assignment of leasehold rights for consideration would not amount to supply…