Extension of due dates for filing FORM GSTR-1 for taxpayers with aggregate turnover of more than Rs.1.5 crores
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi, the 28th March, 2018
G.S.R……(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to subsection (1) of section 37 read with section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the Act), the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby extends the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 under sub-section (1) of section 37 of the Act for the months as specified in column (2) of the Table, by such class of registered persons having aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year, till the time period as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, namely:
Table
| Sl. No. | Month | Last date for filing of return in FORM GSTR-1 |
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
| 1. | April, 2018 | 31st May, 2018 |
| 2. | May, 2018 | 10th June, 2018 |
| 3. | June, 2018 | 10th July, 2018 |
2. The extension of the time limit for furnishing the details or return, as the case may be, under sub-section (2) of section 38 and sub-section (1) of section 39 of the Act, for the months of April to June, 2018 shall be, subsequently, notified in the Official Gazette.
[F. No. 349/58/2017-GST (Pt.)]
(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Download Notification Click Here >>
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…