Extension of time limit for filing declaration in Form GST ITC-04 for goods dispatched/received to/from job worker for July 2017 to June 2018 to 30.09.2018
[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 40/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 4th September, 2018
G.S.R… (E).- In pursuance of section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) and sub-rule (3) of rule 45 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, and in supercession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No. 53/2017-Central Tax, dated the 28th October, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1346 (E), dated the 28th October, 2017, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Commissioner, hereby extends the time limit for making the declaration in FORM GST ITC-04, in respect of goods dispatched to a job worker or received from a job worker or sent from one job worker to another, during the period from July, 2017 to June, 2018 till the 30th day of September, 2018.
[F. No. 349/58/2017- GST (Pt.)]
(Dr. Sreeparvathy S.L.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…
NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets. NALCO has invited Request…
Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…
Entire manufacturing process though by distinct units relevant for exemption from excise duty on account of manufacture without aid of…
High Court condoned delay in filing Form 10B as the failure was in the 1st Year of operation of the…
Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…