GST e-invoicing made mandatory if turnover exceeds Rs. 100 Crores instead of Rs. 500 crores w.e.f. 01.01.2021
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
New Delhi, the 10th November, 2020
G.S.R. 704(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 48 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 13/2020 – Central Tax, dated the 21st March, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 196(E), dated 21st March, 2020, namely:‑
In the said notification, in the first paragraph, with effect from the 1st day of January, 2021, for the words “five hundred crore rupees”, the words “one hundred crore rupees” shall be substituted.
[F. No. CBEC-20/06/04/2020-GST]
PRAMOD KUMAR, Director
Note : The principal notification No. 13/2020 – Central Tax, dated the 21st March, 2020 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 196(E), dated 21st March, 2020 and was last amended vide notification No. 70/2020-Central Tax, dated the 30th September, 2020, published vide number G.S.R. 596(E), dated the 30th September, 2020.
ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…
Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…
ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…