GST Exemption on handicraft goods supply by casual taxable person. Amendment to principle notification
[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017
G.S.R. …..(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 23 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 32/2017- Central Tax, dated the 15th September, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1158(E), dated the 15th September, 2017, namely:-
In the said notification, in the Table – (i) for serial number 9 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
(i) for serial number 9 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
| “9 | Textile (handloom products), Handmade shawls, stoles and scarves | Including 50, 58, 61, 62, 63”; |
(ii) after serial number 28 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
| “29 | Chain stitch | Any chapter |
| 30 | Crewel, namda, gabba | Any chapter |
| 31 | Wicker willow products | Any chapter |
| 32 | Toran | Any chapter |
| 33 | Articles made of shola | Any chapter |
[F. No.349/74/2017-GST(Pt.)]
(Dr. Sreeparvathy S.L.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Note: – The principal notification No.32/2017-Central Tax, dated the 15th September, 2017 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1158 (E), dated the 15th September, 2017.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…