GST

Para 2(g) of Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST to apply to Audit matters also -CBIC

Skip to main content

 
Instruction No. 03/2024-GST
F. No. GST/INV/Instructions/2023-24
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
 
New Delhi, Dated 14″ August, 2024
 
To,
All Pr. Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners,
CGST Zones/ CGST & Customs Zones,
All Principal Directors General/Directors General under CBIC,
All Pr. Commissioners/Commissioners, CX & CGST (incl. Audit)
 
Madany/Sir,

Subject: Applying para 2(g) of Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dt. 30-3-2024 in Audit matters- reg.

The undersigned is directed to say that the Board’s Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dated 30-03-2024 has been issued providing guidelines for maintaining ease of doing business while engaging in investigation with regular taxpayers. The para 2(g) of said Instruction is —
 
2. “The scenario may arise in a CGST Zone where an issue investigated by one of the (Pr.) Commissioners is based on an interpretation of CGST Act/ Rules, notifications, circulars ete, and it is in the direction of proposing non-payment or short payment of tax, however, the background is that the taxpayer(s) is/are following, or have followed, a prevalent trade practice based on particular interpretation on that issue in the sector/industry. This scenario results in more than one interpretation and likelihood of litigation, change in practice etc.
 
In such cases, it is desirable that the zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner make a self-contained reference to the relevant policy wing of the Board i.e. the GST Policy or TRU. The endeavor, to make such reference before concluding investigation, and as much in advance, as is feasible, of the earliest due date for issuing of show cause notice, may be useful in promoting uniformity or avoiding litigation if the matter, after being processed, is amongst those that also gets placed before the GST Council.”
 
2. The Board desires that during the process of audit, wherever the relevant CGST Audit (Pr.) Commissioner comes across the scenario described above, the Zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner should follow the procedure and endeavor prescribed by Board in para 2(g) of above Instruction. This applies also to on-going audit proceedings.
 
Hindi version to follow.
 
Yours faithfully,
(Vijay Mohan Jain) Commissioner,
GST-Investigation, CBIC
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80-IA(7) not allowed for delayed filing of audit report in Form 10CCB

Filing audit report in Form 10CCB within due date is mandatory. The assessee cannot claim deduction u/s 80-IA(7) he ground…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Is CSR expenditure is allowable under section 80G of Income Tax Act – ITAT says “Yes”

CSR expenditure of companies is allowable under section 80G unless fall under the two exceptions specified. In a recent judgment,…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Territorial jurisdiction of ITAT is determined on the basis of situs of Assessing Officer

Jurisdiction of ITAT is determined not by the place of business or residence of assessee but by the location of…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice u/s 148 set-aside as assessee’s e-mail was inactive and notices went un-noticed

Notice u/s 148 set-aside and remitted back since the assessee’s e-mail was inactive leading to all notices go un-noticed In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO after dropping an issue for lack of evidence may re-open it on gathering information

AO after dropping an issue in assessment u/s 143(3) for lack of evidence is competent to re-open such issue upon…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery converted into solid gold not unexplained or in excess of permissible limit

Merely because jewellery is converted into solid gold / gold biscuits, it cannot be presumed to be unexplained or in…

2 days ago