GST

Para 2(g) of Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST to apply to Audit matters also -CBIC

Skip to main content

 
Instruction No. 03/2024-GST
F. No. GST/INV/Instructions/2023-24
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
 
New Delhi, Dated 14″ August, 2024
 
To,
All Pr. Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners,
CGST Zones/ CGST & Customs Zones,
All Principal Directors General/Directors General under CBIC,
All Pr. Commissioners/Commissioners, CX & CGST (incl. Audit)
 
Madany/Sir,

Subject: Applying para 2(g) of Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dt. 30-3-2024 in Audit matters- reg.

The undersigned is directed to say that the Board’s Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dated 30-03-2024 has been issued providing guidelines for maintaining ease of doing business while engaging in investigation with regular taxpayers. The para 2(g) of said Instruction is —
 
2. “The scenario may arise in a CGST Zone where an issue investigated by one of the (Pr.) Commissioners is based on an interpretation of CGST Act/ Rules, notifications, circulars ete, and it is in the direction of proposing non-payment or short payment of tax, however, the background is that the taxpayer(s) is/are following, or have followed, a prevalent trade practice based on particular interpretation on that issue in the sector/industry. This scenario results in more than one interpretation and likelihood of litigation, change in practice etc.
 
In such cases, it is desirable that the zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner make a self-contained reference to the relevant policy wing of the Board i.e. the GST Policy or TRU. The endeavor, to make such reference before concluding investigation, and as much in advance, as is feasible, of the earliest due date for issuing of show cause notice, may be useful in promoting uniformity or avoiding litigation if the matter, after being processed, is amongst those that also gets placed before the GST Council.”
 
2. The Board desires that during the process of audit, wherever the relevant CGST Audit (Pr.) Commissioner comes across the scenario described above, the Zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner should follow the procedure and endeavor prescribed by Board in para 2(g) of above Instruction. This applies also to on-going audit proceedings.
 
Hindi version to follow.
 
Yours faithfully,
(Vijay Mohan Jain) Commissioner,
GST-Investigation, CBIC
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

5 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

1 week ago