GST

Review, revision & appeals for orders passed by GST Common Adjudicating Authority

Guidelines for review, revision, and appeals for orders passed by GST Common Adjudicating Authority

CBIC has issued clarifications / guidelines for review, revision, and appeals for orders passed by GST Common Adjudicating Authority.

CBIC vide Notification No. 02/2017 dated 19th June 2017 (as amended) read with Circular No. 239/33/2024-GST dated 4th December 2024, designated Joint/Additional Commissioners posted in specified Commissionerates as Common Adjudicating Authority (CAA) in respect of show cause notices issued by Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI).

The said circular has specified the procedure to be followed in case of assigning such show cause notices to the Common Adjudicating Authority along with their territorial jurisdiction.

However, the said circular does not specify the procedure related to review, revision, and appeals for such Orders-in -Original (O-I-Os) passed by CAA.

It is notable that section 107 of the CGSTAct, 2017 provides a detailed mechanism for handling the appeals by the Appellate authority and by exercising the same power, the rules have also been framed with regard to appeal and review. Similarly, the Reviewing Authority also has the power under the said section to review adjudication orders passed by a CAA who is posted under the said reviewing authority.

Similarly, Section 108 of the CGST Act, 2017, provides a detailed mechanism for revision of such orders. Vide notification No. 05/2020-Central tax dated 13th January, 2020, the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be, has been authorized as revisional authority for decisions or orders passed by Additional or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax who are subordinate to him.

CBIC in order to ensure uniformity in procedure for review, revision, and appeal against the Orders-in-Original adjudicated by Common Adjudicating Authorities has given following clarifications vide Circular No. 250/7/2025-GST dated 24.06.2025:

(a) Review under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax under whom the Common Adjudicating Authority (Additional/ Joint Commissioner) is posted shall be the reviewing authority in respect of such O-I-Os.
(b) Revisional Power under Section 108 of the CGST Act, 2017 The Principal Commissioner  or  Commissioner  of  Central  Tax  under  whom  the  Common Adjudicating Authority (Additional/ Joint Commissioner) is posted shall be the revisional authority in respect of such O-I-Os.
(c) Appeal Procedure under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 Appeals against the  order  of  Common Adjudicating Authority  (Additional/Joint  Commissioner) shall  lie  before  the  Commissioner  (Appeals)  corresponding  to  the  territorial jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner of Central Tax, under  whom  the  said  Common  Adjudicating  Authority  (Additional/  Joint Commissioner) is posted, as specified in Table III of notification No. 02/2017-Central tax dated 19th June, 2017. 
(d) Department’s  Representation  in  Appeals The  Principal  Commissioner  or Commissioner of Central Tax of such Commissionerate under whom the Common Adjudicating Authority (Additional/Joint Commissioner) is posted shall represent the department in appeal proceedings against the O-I-Os passed by such Common Adjudicating Authority (Additional/  Joint Commissioner) and accordingly may appoint  any  officer  subordinate  to  him  to  be  the  designated  officer  for  filing departmental appeals
(e) The reviewing or revisional authority for such orders may seek comments on the O-I-O from the concerned DGGI formation before proceeding to decide on the order passed by the CAA

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Compliance history of supplier can’t be used to invalidate genuine business transactions of buyer

Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Reassessment quashed as AO issued notice u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on search

Reassessment quashed as AO issued u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on incriminating material found during search…

20 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Empanelment of CA/CMA /Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services at EPIL

Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/Cost Accountant/Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. has invited application for…

21 hours ago
  • Service Tax

Individual contract for booking persons for participation in event not event management liable to service tax

Individual contract for booking of persons for participation in an event is not “event management” contracts liable to service tax…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Minor delay should not come in legitimate claim for any deduction – High Court

Minor delay should not come in the way of legitimate claim for any deduction if the assessee is otherwise entitled…

23 hours ago