Coaching classes advertisements not misconduct when CA voluntarily abstained from practice area of chartered accountancy-Delhi High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
978 2016 (07) HC
Date/Month of Judgment : July 2016
Brief Facts of the Case:
The respondent chartered accountantin this case had been held guilty of “other misconduct” within the meaning of clause (2) Part-IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The respondent chartered accountant had challenged the report of the Board of Discipline of ICAI. During the course of such petition, the respondent CA had given an undertaking to the Delhi High Court that he shall voluntarily not practice the profession of Chartered Accountant till the next date of hearing
The present writ had been filed alleging that the respondent chartered accountant, despite giving the undertaking as above, has issued advertisements representing himself as a Chartered Accountant thereby wilfully violating the statement given to the Court and was thus guilty of Contempt of Court.
Observations made by the Court:
No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…
Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…
Case remanded as no finding was given whether cash payments disallowed u/s 40A(3) were covered by Rule 6DD under Income…
In case of investment in share capital, the source of investment may remain outside the control of the investee company.…
ICAI issues revised Code of Ethics (13th edition) ICAI has released revised Code of Ethics (13th edition). The revised Code…
Modified Norms for Nomination in Demat Accounts and Mutual Fund Folio SEBI has modified Norms on Nomination to be implemented…