Coaching classes advertisements not misconduct when CA voluntarily abstained from practice area of chartered accountancy-Delhi High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
978 2016 (07) HC
Date/Month of Judgment : July 2016
Brief Facts of the Case:
The respondent chartered accountantin this case had been held guilty of “other misconduct” within the meaning of clause (2) Part-IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The respondent chartered accountant had challenged the report of the Board of Discipline of ICAI. During the course of such petition, the respondent CA had given an undertaking to the Delhi High Court that he shall voluntarily not practice the profession of Chartered Accountant till the next date of hearing
The present writ had been filed alleging that the respondent chartered accountant, despite giving the undertaking as above, has issued advertisements representing himself as a Chartered Accountant thereby wilfully violating the statement given to the Court and was thus guilty of Contempt of Court.
Observations made by the Court:
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…
ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…
Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…
The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…
One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…
Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…