ICAI

Coaching classes advertisements not misconduct when CA abstained from practice area of chartered accountancy-Delhi High Court

Coaching classes advertisements not misconduct when CA voluntarily abstained from practice area of chartered accountancy-Delhi High Court

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
978 2016 (07) HC
Date/Month of Judgment : July 2016

Brief Facts of the Case:
The respondent chartered accountantin this case had been held guilty of “other misconduct” within the meaning of clause (2) Part-IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The respondent chartered accountant had challenged the report of the Board of Discipline of ICAI.  During the course of  such petition, the respondent CA had given an undertaking to the Delhi High Court that he shall voluntarily not practice the profession of Chartered Accountant till the next date of hearing

The present writ had been filed alleging that the respondent chartered accountant, despite giving the undertaking as above, has issued advertisements representing himself as a Chartered Accountant thereby wilfully violating the statement given to the Court and was thus guilty of Contempt of Court.

Observations made by the Court:

  1. The advertisements showed that the respondent was running coaching classes. It was nowhere stated that the respondent was offering to render services of auditing or verification of financial transactions, books, accounts, or records or any services related to accounting procedure or recording presentation or certification of financial facts or data etc.
  2. The respondent, by the said advertisements, was merely offering coaching to aspirants of the profession of chartered accountancy.
  3. The respondent was registered as a Chartered Accountant and till he was removed from the rolls, he was entitled to use the prefix and suffix “CA”.
  4. Though Board of Discipline of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India had held the respondent guilty of “other misconduct”, the punishment was still to be awarded.
  5. The issuance of advertisements offering to take coaching classes and to impart of training to aspirants of the profession of chartered accountancy, in the above circumstances, could not be said to be carrying on the profession of chartered accountancy..

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago