Coaching classes advertisements not misconduct when CA voluntarily abstained from practice area of chartered accountancy-Delhi High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
978 2016 (07) HC
Date/Month of Judgment : July 2016
Brief Facts of the Case:
The respondent chartered accountantin this case had been held guilty of “other misconduct” within the meaning of clause (2) Part-IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The respondent chartered accountant had challenged the report of the Board of Discipline of ICAI. During the course of such petition, the respondent CA had given an undertaking to the Delhi High Court that he shall voluntarily not practice the profession of Chartered Accountant till the next date of hearing
The present writ had been filed alleging that the respondent chartered accountant, despite giving the undertaking as above, has issued advertisements representing himself as a Chartered Accountant thereby wilfully violating the statement given to the Court and was thus guilty of Contempt of Court.
Observations made by the Court:
In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…