ICAI

Directions issued by Committee of experts on regulating Audit firms and Networks

Directions issued by Committee of experts on regulating Audit firms and the Networks as per its report submitted in pursuance of  directions of the Supreme Court

(i) The Union of India may constitute a three member Committee of experts to look into the question whether and to what extent the statutory framework to enforce the letter and spirit of Sections 25 and 29 of the CA Act and the statutory Code of Conduct for the CAs requires revisit so as to appropriately discipline and regulate MAFs. The Committee may also consider the need for an appropriate legislation on the pattern of Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002 and Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 2010 in US or any other appropriate mechanism for oversight of profession of the auditors. Question whether on account of conflict of interest of auditors with consultants, the auditors’ profession may need an exclusive oversight body may be examined. The Committee may examine the Study Group and the Expert Group Reports referred to above, apart from any other material. It may also consider steps for effective enforcement of the provisions of the FDI policy and the FEMA Regulations referred to above It may identify the remedial measures which may then be considered by appropriate authorities. The Committee may call for suggestions from all concerned. Such Committee may be constituted within two months. Report of the Committee may be submitted within three months thereafter. The UOI may take further action after due consideration of such report.

(ii) The ED may complete the pending investigation within three months;

(iii) ICAI may further examine all the related issues at appropriate level as far as possible within three months and take such further steps as may be considered necessary.

The Committee of Experts has submitted its report on Regulating audit firms and the Networks to the Government of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The Committee was constituted on April 20, 2018 pursuant to the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of S. Sukumar versus The Secretary, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.  The Committee consisted of Shri Anurag Agarwal, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs,  Shri Sudhanshu Pandey, Additional Secretary, Department of Commerce and Shri Ravinder, Joint Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion.

The report addresses the issues raised by the Supreme Court with a focus to strengthen the legal regime of auditors and promote development of the audit profession in the country. The Committee scrutinised the networking arrangements adopted by the big four audit firms commonly referred as multi-national accounting firms to understand their legal structure and method of operation. The Committee also addressed serious concerns like conflict of interest and transparency arising out of non-audit services provided by auditors and their network, and suggested necessary checks and balances. Further, the report deals with the issue of concentration of market power which is another contemporary problem in the market for audit services.

Download Committee’s report Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(1)(a) to remand case can be exercised only in best judgment assessment

Power of CIT(A) under section 251(1)(a) to remand case could be exercised only when the assessment is passed u/s 144…

6 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines, 2025 kept in abeyance

ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines, 2025 kept in abeyance In February 2026, ICAI had issued ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines 2025 to…

15 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Bank of India-Online Concurrent Audit Empanelment FY 2026-27. Last Date : 15.07.2026

Bank of India-Online Concurrent Audit Empanelment  FY 2026-27. Last Date to apply is 15.07.2026 Notice for CA firms applying for…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessing Officer not an expert to do the job of share premium valuation – ITAT

  AO was not competent in valuing the share premium amount as he is not an expert to do the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No law prevents Bengali’s right to be in Hindu Joint Family (HUF) – ITAT

Under Dayabhag law there is nothing to prevent Bengalis to be in Hindu Joint Family (HUF) In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Presumption u/s 132(4A) r.w.s. 292C applicable only to searched person not to third person – ITAT

There is no presumption of accuracy or truthfulness of any loose sheet found in search premises of a third party…

3 days ago