ICAI

ICAI bans 21 chartered accountants for guilty of professional misconduct

ICAI bans 21 Chartered Accountants for guilty of professional misconduct

In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute has held the following CAs guilty of professional misconduct

Name Membership No. Address Punishment
CA. S Shankar 040476 Coimbatore Banned for seven months
CA. Vishal Dhingra 408383 Ghaziabad Banned for five years
CA. Avinash Lalwani 048715 Mumbai Banned for three months
CA Kishore Purushottam Joshi 034760 Mumbai Banned 5 years
CA Sanjit Kumar SIngh 504600 Delhi Banned for 15 days
CA Madhukar Raghunath Tile 042963 Nashik Banned for 1 year
CA Ankit Daga 419176 Jaipur Banned for 1 Year
CA Priya Wadhwa 516631 Delhi Banned for 2 months
CA Suresh Kumar Goklani 075009 Jodhpur Banned for 4 months
CA Dinesh Gopalrao Malpathak 006427 Nashik Banned for 3 months
CA Anurag Srivastava  073264 Kanpur Banned for 15 months
CA Jeetendra Kumar Amar  065389 Kolkata Banned for 1 month
CA Padmakesh Dubey 403892 Jharkhand Banned for 1 month
CA Gaurav Agarwal 505241 Delhi Banned for 1 month
CA Avdhesh Nittal 083360 New Delhi Banned for 45 days
CA Kishan Gupta 084077 New Delhi Banned for 1 year
CA Ravindra M C 019751 Bengaluru Banned for 1 month
CA Mulraj Devchand Gala 041206 Mumbai Banned for 1 year
CA Neelam Dhawan 081035 New Delhi Banned for 3 months
CA Mohd. Shahin Ashraf Padath 210295 Ernakulam Banned for 1 year
CA Raj Kumar Sawhney 010516 New Delhi Banned for 1 year

Download Notifications Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

1 day ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

3 days ago