ICAI bans 21 Chartered Accountants for guilty of professional misconduct
In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute has held the following CAs guilty of professional misconduct
Name | Membership No. | Address | Punishment |
CA. S Shankar | 040476 | Coimbatore | Banned for seven months |
CA. Vishal Dhingra | 408383 | Ghaziabad | Banned for five years |
CA. Avinash Lalwani | 048715 | Mumbai | Banned for three months |
CA Kishore Purushottam Joshi | 034760 | Mumbai | Banned 5 years |
CA Sanjit Kumar SIngh | 504600 | Delhi | Banned for 15 days |
CA Madhukar Raghunath Tile | 042963 | Nashik | Banned for 1 year |
CA Ankit Daga | 419176 | Jaipur | Banned for 1 Year |
CA Priya Wadhwa | 516631 | Delhi | Banned for 2 months |
CA Suresh Kumar Goklani | 075009 | Jodhpur | Banned for 4 months |
CA Dinesh Gopalrao Malpathak | 006427 | Nashik | Banned for 3 months |
CA Anurag Srivastava | 073264 | Kanpur | Banned for 15 months |
CA Jeetendra Kumar Amar | 065389 | Kolkata | Banned for 1 month |
CA Padmakesh Dubey | 403892 | Jharkhand | Banned for 1 month |
CA Gaurav Agarwal | 505241 | Delhi | Banned for 1 month |
CA Avdhesh Nittal | 083360 | New Delhi | Banned for 45 days |
CA Kishan Gupta | 084077 | New Delhi | Banned for 1 year |
CA Ravindra M C | 019751 | Bengaluru | Banned for 1 month |
CA Mulraj Devchand Gala | 041206 | Mumbai | Banned for 1 year |
CA Neelam Dhawan | 081035 | New Delhi | Banned for 3 months |
CA Mohd. Shahin Ashraf Padath | 210295 | Ernakulam | Banned for 1 year |
CA Raj Kumar Sawhney | 010516 | New Delhi | Banned for 1 year |
Download Notifications Click Here >>
- Benefit of ITC accrued under UP VAT Act after introduction of GST Act 2017 – SLP admitted
- Mounting auto rickshaw body on chassis, amounts to new product – Supreme Court
- Registration u/s 12A granted without applying tests laid down by Apex Court set aside
- In absence of satisfaction recorded for penalty u/s 271D, penalty couldn’t be levied
- GST Act requires personal hearing either on request, or when adverse order is contemplated