ICAI bans 21 Chartered Accountants for guilty of professional misconduct
In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute has held the following CAs guilty of professional misconduct
| Name | Membership No. | Address | Punishment |
| CA. S Shankar | 040476 | Coimbatore | Banned for seven months |
| CA. Vishal Dhingra | 408383 | Ghaziabad | Banned for five years |
| CA. Avinash Lalwani | 048715 | Mumbai | Banned for three months |
| CA Kishore Purushottam Joshi | 034760 | Mumbai | Banned 5 years |
| CA Sanjit Kumar SIngh | 504600 | Delhi | Banned for 15 days |
| CA Madhukar Raghunath Tile | 042963 | Nashik | Banned for 1 year |
| CA Ankit Daga | 419176 | Jaipur | Banned for 1 Year |
| CA Priya Wadhwa | 516631 | Delhi | Banned for 2 months |
| CA Suresh Kumar Goklani | 075009 | Jodhpur | Banned for 4 months |
| CA Dinesh Gopalrao Malpathak | 006427 | Nashik | Banned for 3 months |
| CA Anurag Srivastava | 073264 | Kanpur | Banned for 15 months |
| CA Jeetendra Kumar Amar | 065389 | Kolkata | Banned for 1 month |
| CA Padmakesh Dubey | 403892 | Jharkhand | Banned for 1 month |
| CA Gaurav Agarwal | 505241 | Delhi | Banned for 1 month |
| CA Avdhesh Nittal | 083360 | New Delhi | Banned for 45 days |
| CA Kishan Gupta | 084077 | New Delhi | Banned for 1 year |
| CA Ravindra M C | 019751 | Bengaluru | Banned for 1 month |
| CA Mulraj Devchand Gala | 041206 | Mumbai | Banned for 1 year |
| CA Neelam Dhawan | 081035 | New Delhi | Banned for 3 months |
| CA Mohd. Shahin Ashraf Padath | 210295 | Ernakulam | Banned for 1 year |
| CA Raj Kumar Sawhney | 010516 | New Delhi | Banned for 1 year |
Download Notifications Click Here >>
- Information in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, can’t be said to belong to assessee
- Setting aside remand order of CIT(A) without interfering with direction to delete addition, did not revive AO’s order
- Whether Arbitral Tribunal can grant a prohibited claim in a contract – Larger Bench to decide
- Court can examine contractual employee termination on sole ground of ineligibility
- Upon deceased acquiring family, as specified earlier GPF nomination became invalid – SC
