Tag: Reopening us 147
Reopening done at the insistence of CIT held as change of opinion and was vitiated in law as it did not satisfy the legal requirement of Section 147 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3124 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Larsen and …
ITAT authorised to consider question of jurisdiction raised first time and not raised earlier as it goes to the root of the matter and substantially affects the rights of assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3111 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Thermal Power …
Reopening u/s 148 alleging evidence discovered with due diligence quashed as no specific failure on part of the assessee was stated. SC dismisses SLP of the Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3110 (2019) (08) SC The respondent assessee was a company. For the relevant assessment year it had …
Merely a judgment rendered can not be a basis / ground for reopening an assessment u/s 147 unless assessee fails to disclose material facts truly & fully ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3108 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. M/s. Ansal Housing Finance …
Reopening for not replying to invalid and non est inquiry letter for cash deposited in bank quashed. Deposit per se cannot be income of assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3106 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Tajendra Kumar Ghai Vs ITO In the instant …
Reopening due to change in method of accounting for NPA quashed as it was notified in audited accounts. SC dismissed SLP of Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3069 (2019) (07) SC The Assessing Officer (AO) had initiated re-assessment proceedings against the respondent bank under Section 147 read with …
No addition made on account of reasons recorded for reopening, the reassessment, order passed was vitiated in law – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2939 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT v. Jet Airways (I) Ltd. (2011) 52 DTR 71 Shri …
Reopening of assessment for past years on account of the cancellation of Registration u/s 12AA is not permissible unless registration was obtained by fraud, collusion or concealment of any material fact ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2742 (2019) (01) HC The Petitioner had filed the instant Petition against the …
Tribunal declined to issue direction to AO to reopen cases under section 147 as Department have enough powers u/s 147, 263 and 154 to tax escaped income ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2701 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: ITO Vs. Muralidhar Bhagwan das 52 ITR …
DVO Report based on mere estimate not sufficient information for the purpose of reopening assessment u/s 147. ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2675 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:ACIT vs. Dhariya Construction Co. (2010) 328 ITR 515 (SC) ITO vs. Santosh Kumar …
