Category: ITAT

No penalty u/s 271F as due to mistake of DDO wrong PAN was mentioned in 26AS and assessee was precluded from filing the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3808 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …

Benefit of concessional rate of tax u/s 115BAA can not be denied on the premise that assessee has to file Form No. 10IC for each assessment year ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3807 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …

Depositing unutilized capital gain amount in a special account is only a procedural matter, and non-compliance thereof cannot result in disallowance of deduction u/s 54 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3806 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs Venkata Dilip Kumar (277 taxman …

Assessing Officer was wrong to put the onus on assessee to prove that alleged cash transaction did not taken place – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3805 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the Income Tax Officer has challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in deleting …

Reasons on which reopening done must first survive to make addition on additional issues also – ITAT explains Explanation 3 to section 147 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3804 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) and raised the …

Denial of Registration u/s 12AB remanded for de novo consideration when notices were issued at very close intervals and hearing concluded within a very short span of time In a recent judgment, ITAT has quashed the order passed by CIT(E) denying Registration u/s 12AB as order was passed …

Revision u/s 263 was justified due to contradictory stand of assessee on credit card cash payments was left out of examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3802 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT, Shimla Versus Greenworld Corporation 2009 181 Taxman 111 (SC)Mr. Jitendra …

Assessing Officer was wrong to disbelieve partnership rectification deed when stamp paper was issued on a prior date – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3801 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A)/NFAC in confirming the action of Assessing …

ITAT deleted addition for cash deposits in bank during demonetization period following CBDT Instruction that no addition to be made up to Rs. 2.50 lakhs ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3800 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming …

Issue of bonus shares not taxable. ITAT deleted addition made u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that issue of bonus shares is not taxable u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) as income from other sources  ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3799 (2023) (09) ITAT …