Category: ITAT

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Allahabad has reiterated that requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory, recourse to provisions …

Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original Assessment Order – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that limitation for PCIT to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the …

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that AO was not justified in rejecting the registered valuer’s report and taking the cost of improvement as Nil, without making a reference to …

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that the assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent non-resident company towards IT …

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra has held that there was no need for addition in the hands of the assessee who was only a carrier of cash …

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent judgment, ITAT has set aside the penalty u/s 271D and remanded the case for determination of whether payment of imprest constitutes a transfer within the meaning of section …

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of the searched person – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that when additions have been confirmed in the hands of the searched person therefore, no …

Case remanded as no finding was given whether cash payments disallowed u/s 40A(3) were covered by Rule 6DD under Income Tax Rules, 1962.  In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has remanded the case as there was no finding by the CIT(A) or the Assessing Officer whether the cash …

After notice u/s 143(2) is issued in scrutiny proceedings, summary processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Bangalore has held that once scrutiny proceedings initiated by issue of notice u/s 143(2), the assessment proceedings are set in motion under the regular assessment …

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that an Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal ABCAUS Case Law Citation:5154 (2026) (05) abacus.in ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by Parties In …