Category: ITAT
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank during demonetization period deleted as cash was deposited by trade debtors ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3465 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malpani House of Stones Vs CIT (88 taxmaann.com 546) (Raj HC)CIT vs Aggarwal Engg Co. (302 ITR …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on filing revised return when no such questionnaire was issued with notice u/s 143(2) ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3463 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald MeadowsPr. CIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd.ITO vs. Sitashri Trading & Finance …
Harish Salve gets relief from ITAT. Funding education of Indian law students abroad allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) as goodwill measure ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3462 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming disallowance of …
Partners salary revised just before end of financial year allowed being in accordance with terms of deed and law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3458 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the …
Addition u/s 69 for unexplained cash deleted by the Tribunal. It was held that tag of another bank found on cash bundles not to be given weightage as it is a common practice amongst banks to issue currency bundles as received by them ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3457 …
STamp duty valuation not a relevant criteria to decide payment of on-money by assessee but piece of evidence to ascertain correct facts with regard to value of property ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3455 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:ShyamKumar vs. ACIT (2018) 99 Taxman.com 39Pullongode Rubber …
Education cess is an allowable expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act 1961. ITAT allows deduction on the basis of CBDT circular and PAN India judgments ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3450 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. vs CIT (1998) …
Reason recorded by non jurisdictional Assessing Officer cannot give jurisdiction to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3449 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Pankaj Bhai Jayshuklal Shah vs. CIT (2020) 425 ITR 70Manoj Kumar vs. ACIT reported 79 ITR (Tribunal) 158 Delhi In the …
Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for scientific research allowed in hands of donors, notwithstanding approval granted to Organization withdrawn retrospectively ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3448 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala, 91 ITR 18 (SC)IT vs. Chotatingrai Tea & Ors., …
Advance taken in cash against sale not loan or deposit u/s 269SS hence no penalty us/ 271D is leviable on the assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3447 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the order …
