Category: ITAT
Rejection of books of accounts for non maintenance of stock register or incorrect valuation method or non compliance with accounting standard not sufficient. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3328 (2020) (07) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ACIT vs. Yerra Nagabhushanam (1997) 226 ITR 843, 849 (AP)Kunhambu …
Delay in filing appeal due to assessee not present at his residence and took time in consulting his Counsel condoned by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3326 (2020) (07) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 …
Lack of enquiry in a particular manner or as per procedures prescribed vitiates the assessment only when relevant provisions are applicable. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3325 (2020) (07) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal of the assessee was directed against the action of the Pr. CIT …
No bar in claiming deduction u/s 54F in reopening proceedings u/s 147. ITAT direct Assessing Officer to decide exemption afresh ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3324 (2020) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal of the assessee was directed against the ex parte order passed by the …
Meaning of genuineness of trust activities – they should not be bogus, artificial or camouflaged and whether in accordance with objects – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3323 (2020) (06) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Baburam Education Society (2018) 96 taxmann.com 606 Meaning of Genuineness …
Exemption u/s 54F allowed as vendor insisted for execution of two sale deeds to avoid TDS as agreement for purchase of property was not disputed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3319 (2020) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed …
No penalty u/s 271E where persons are properly identified and transactions are genuine as there can be no attempt to evade tax – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3318 (2020) (06) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Industrial Enterprises vs. DCIT 73 ITD 252ADIT vs. Kumari …
Expenditure for earning interest income allowed u/s 57(ii) as nexus between loan taken and amount invested in FDR not was doubted ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3315 (2020) (05) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. RajendraPrasad Moody, 115 ITR 519 (SC) astern Investments Ltd. v. …
ALP determined in good faith and with due diligence by assessee was not liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3310 (2020) (05) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Dharmendra Textile Processors 295 ITR 244Zoom Communication Pvt. Ltd. 327 ITR 510MAK Data Pvt. Ltd. …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) merely due to quantum addition without making fresh verification during penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3299 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Textiles Vs. CIT 249 ITR 125. The issue involved in this case was related to penalty …
