Category: ITAT
Notice u/s 148 for cash deposit after preliminary enquiry was valid as assessee was a non-filer and failed to respond ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3397 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: Vinod Commodities Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 49 (Jodh) Sh. …
Revision u/s 263 to exclude issues settled in Vivad se Vishvas Scheme 2020. ITAT directs AO not to consider capital gains from penny stock while passing fresh order ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3396 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Price Water House vs ACIT …
Separate agreement towards rent of property and hiring charges for equipment and services allowable. Revenue cannot prevent it merely for loss to Revenue. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3395 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Ranbaxy laboratories vs. CIT (2011) 336 ITR 136 (del)CIT vs. …
Reassessment made by issue of notice 143(2) before filing of return of income is invalid and not sustainable in the eyes of law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3394 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Singhad Technical Society 397 ITR 344.Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. …
Reassessment quashed as void ab-initio for service of notice u/s 148 at wrong address when assessee had communicated changed new address ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3392 (2020) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in rejecting the objection raised …
Without cogent reasons for belief towards escapement, even a non-filer can not be forced to file a return u/s 147. ITAT held notice u/s 147 bad in Law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3391 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Ravindrasinh N. Gohil vs. …
Assessee entitled to tax credit u/s 91 of both federal and state taxes paid by him. Benefit also available to not ordinarily resident Indians ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3390 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Wipro Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
CIT need not to given separate reasons for his satisfaction in giving approval u/s 151 for reopening of assessment if reasons recorded by AO have a direct nexus with the information and formation of belief of income escapement. Â ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3388 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case …
Mere surplus from exhibition not trade commerce or business activities u/s 2(15) making it non-charitable ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3386 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers vs. Income Tax Officer, (2016) 71 taxmann.com 138Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. …
Taking a view should be backed by reasons in the order itself with evidences and independent enquiry. ITAT upheld revision order passed u/s 263 ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3385 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Rampyari Devi Sarogi vs CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 …
