Category: ITAT
Receipt of immovable property from relative is not taxable u/s 56(2)(x) and cannot be brought o tax u/s 68 for difference in stamp duty valuation and value declared in gift deeds. In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has held that receipt of immovable property from a ‘relative’ is …
Rejecting condonation of delay and dismissing appeal without verifying medical certificates – ITAT sets aside order of CIT(A) In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow set aside the order of the CIT(A) as he rejected the assessee’s request for condonation of delay without conducting any independent inquiry regarding the …
Addition u/s 68 can not be made applicable where there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans at all during the year – ITAT In a recent judgment, Agra ITAT has held that addition u/s 68 of the Act could be made applicable where there is no fresh …
Amount of taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded while computing gross receipts for estimating net profit – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad directed AO to exclude the amount of taxes collected on sales comprised in turnover, while computing gross receipts for the purpose …
Every provision invoked casts a different sort of onus on the assessee – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 towards bogus purchases – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that every provision invoked casts a different sort of onus on the assessee and assertion that merely …
Interest under section 234A cannot be levied on self-assessment tax paid before the due date of filing of return of income. In a recent judgment, Chennai ITAT has held that once the self assessment tax has been fully paid before the due date for filing return, no interest …
No addition can be made only on basis of Whatsapp Chats between director and employee of the company as apart from the Whatsapp Chat there was no evidence on record. In a recent judgment, ITAT Kolkata has deleted addition made only on the basis of Whatsapp Chats between …
Wrong penalty section mentioned in Assessment order can be rectified being mistake apparent on record when there is no debate in imposing penalty under rectified section. In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has held that when section 271AAB was wrongly mentioned in Assessment order instead of Section 271AAC, …
Just because log book was not maintained does not mean that vehicles were used for personal purposes by the Trustee – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has holding that just because log book was not maintained does not mean that Vehicles were used for personal purposes …
Date of dispatch of Speed Post of duly verified ITR-V shall be considered for the purpose of determination of 30 days period – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh has allowed the benefit of New Tax Regime to the assesee as the date of dispatch of Speed …
