Category: Judgments
Repairs to preserve and maintain already existing asset and to improve its longevity eligible eligible as current repairs ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3015 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. M/s MAC Charles (India) Ltd. CIT vs. TS Tech Sun India …
AO not required to issue draft rectification order for assessment completed u/s 144C. Only a proposed “order of assessment” can be challenged before DRP ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3014 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs C Sam India Pvt Ltd Dimension Data …
Draft Assessment order u/s 144C with demand and penalty notice is illegal as it partakes the character of final assessment order – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3013 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pr. CIT Vs. Lionbridge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. International …
Exemption u/s 54B available even if part of land is in cultivation, there is no requirement that entire land should be in cultivation for claiming benefit. Merely because of admission to disallowance, assessee can not be denied the benefit to which he is eligible ABCAUS Case Law Citation: …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted as addition for bogus purchases was based on estimation and assesee’s conduct was not found contumacious ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3011 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Hindustan Steel Vs. State of Orissa (83 ITR 26) The appellant …
Provision of section 68 applicable even if business not commenced but the sum is credited in the books of account of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3010 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT V Bharat Engineering and Cost Co 83 …
Tenancy rights not intangible assets, no question of allowing depreciation on it – ITAT. These rights not covered as “any other business or commercial right” ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3009 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: M.M. Nissim & Co. vs. ACIT …
No addition warranted for bogus purchases where GP rate was better than the average GP rate declared by assessee for earlier years ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3008 (2019) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the revenue had challenged the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) in …
Construction of flats purchasing land amounts to civil construction and profit earned thereon, are eligible for taxation U/s 44AD of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3005 (2019) (06) ITAT The AO received information from the Director of Income Tax (Inv) that the assessee had …
Disallowance for prior period expenses deleted by the ITAT as the tax rate was the same from one year to another year ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3004 (2019) (06) ITAT In this appeal, the revenue WAS aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition …
