Category: Judgments
Revision u/s 263 merely on ground of non-discussion / non-mentioning of reply to queries in assessment proceeding/order is invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3123 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (2000) 109 taxman 66 (SC)CIT vs. Krishan Capbox Ltd. …
Incriminating documents belonging to or containing information pertaining to assessee. The High Court explains the amendment made in section 153C ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3122 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties: Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2014) 367 …
Proceedings initiated u/s 148 instead of section 153C quashed. ITAT explains the difference between jurisdiction under both sections ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3121 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Thermal Power Co. Ltd., Vs. CIT (SC).Smt.Archana Pandey Vs. ITO (2013) F G. Koteshwara …
Section 292BB does not save complete absence of notice. Section seeks to cure only infirmities in service of notice – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3120 (2019) (08) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon’ (2010) 321 ITR 362 The instant …
Transfer pricing adjustment without reference to TPO. Supreme Court upholds that AO breached mandatory Instruction but restored appeal to AO ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3119 (2019) (08) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties: The instant Appeal by Special Leave was made by the Revenue to …
Penalty notice u/s 271AAB without specifying ground and default in the show cause notice u/s 274 held not valid – ITAT quashed the order passed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3118 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory 359 …
Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) without specifying specific charge quashed. The decisions relied by Revenue rejected by the Tribunal ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3117 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Jagdamba Prasad Gupta, Delhi vs. ACITSundaram Finance Ltd., vs. CIT 403 ITR 407 (Mad.) …
Application of correct limb of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is a question of fact and not a question of law. ITAT dismissed issue raised before it for the first time ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3114 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Sundaram Finance 403 ITR …
If business not closed down, expenses allowed u/s 37(1) even if turnover was low as it was temporary lull which assessee was trying to revive – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3113 (2019) (08) ITAT The instant appeal had been filed by the assessee against impugned order passed …
Non profit company not a comparable for Transfer Pricing. ITAT directed AO to exclude it from the list of comparables to benchmark international transaction. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3112 (2019) (08) ITAT The appellant assessee was is a subsidiary of the parent company which operated travel website under …
