Category: Judgments
In revision proceedings CIT cannot travel beyond the reasons given in the show-cause notice u/s 263 – Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3809 (2023) (09) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs. Amitabh Bachchan (384 ITR 200) (2016) In the …
No penalty u/s 271F as due to mistake of DDO wrong PAN was mentioned in 26AS and assessee was precluded from filing the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3808 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Benefit of concessional rate of tax u/s 115BAA can not be denied on the premise that assessee has to file Form No. 10IC for each assessment year ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3807 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
Depositing unutilized capital gain amount in a special account is only a procedural matter, and non-compliance thereof cannot result in disallowance of deduction u/s 54 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3806 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs Venkata Dilip Kumar (277 taxman …
Assessing Officer was wrong to put the onus on assessee to prove that alleged cash transaction did not taken place – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3805 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the Income Tax Officer has challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in deleting …
Reasons on which reopening done must first survive to make addition on additional issues also – ITAT explains Explanation 3 to section 147 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3804 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) and raised the …
Denial of Registration u/s 12AB remanded for de novo consideration when notices were issued at very close intervals and hearing concluded within a very short span of time In a recent judgment, ITAT has quashed the order passed by CIT(E) denying Registration u/s 12AB as order was passed …
Revision u/s 263 was justified due to contradictory stand of assessee on credit card cash payments was left out of examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3802 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT, Shimla Versus Greenworld Corporation 2009 181 Taxman 111 (SC)Mr. Jitendra …
Assessing Officer was wrong to disbelieve partnership rectification deed when stamp paper was issued on a prior date – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3801 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A)/NFAC in confirming the action of Assessing …
ITAT deleted addition for cash deposits in bank during demonetization period following CBDT Instruction that no addition to be made up to Rs. 2.50 lakhs ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3800 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming …
