Tag: condonation of delay

Exemption u/s 11 can not be denied for belated filing of revised Form 10B when original Form 10B was filed within due date – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has held that benefit of exemption u/s 11 can not be denied on the ground of belated …

CBDT Circular fixing a time limit for making condonation application u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is illegal – Madras High Court In a recent judgment, Madras High Court condoned the delay in filing audit report Form 10-B observing that CBDT Circular fixing a …

CBDT relaxes time limit for processing u/s 143(1) of returns filed after condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) Relaxation of time limit for processing under section 143(1) of valid returns of income filed electronically pursuant to order u/s 119(2)(b) passed by Competent Authority CBDT has issued Circular No. 07/2025 …

Without enquiring when the order was actually served, dismissing the appeal for inordinate delay was not justified – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has held that without enquiring into, when assessee was actually served with the order, dismissing the appeal for inordinate delay was not justified. …

ITAT condoned delay of 346 days observing law and provisions are laid down to benefit both sides of litigation. In a recent judgment, ITAT Rajkot condoned the delay of 346 days in filing appeal observing that provisions of law have to be adhered strictly and that one cannot …

High Court condoned delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in filing audit report before return had caused confusion. In a recent judgment, Kerala High Court condoned the delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in …

There is a difference between CBDT or its authorised member making an order u/s 119(2)(b) and some other officers making an order with the approval, even of the member of the CBDT.  In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Bombay High Court while quashing the order passed u/s 119(2)(b) by …

There was no delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) as CPC intimation u/s 143(1) received on email after 30 days – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Cochin has held that there was no delay in filing of appeal by assessee as CPC email of intimation u/s 143(1) …

Reasons assigned for explaining the condonation of delay are to be construed with a justice oriented approach – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh condoned the delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) due to mistake of counsel observing that Courts are unanimous in their approach to propound …

Delay of 1 and ½ years cannot be considered as inordinate delay unless negligence or want of due diligence on the part of assessee is shown – ITAT  In a recent judgment, ITAT Cuttack while condoning the delay in filing appeal observed that delay of 1 and ½ …