Tag: demonetisation

Order u/s 148A(d) quashed being beyond the scope of the notice issued under Section 148A(b). In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court quashed order passed under Section 148A(d) being beyond the scope of the notice issued under Section 148A(b) as in the notice there was no …

Cash Advance received by the assessee and not doubted by AO can’t be rejected as source of cash available for deposits in bank – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra held that when Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the advance received from customers in cash as genuine and …

Onus is on assessee to prove and substantiate that he is in retail business, and eligible to claim presumptive of taxation u/s 44AD – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra has held that onus is on the assessee to prove and substantiate that the assessee is in …

CIT(A) can not dismiss appeal in limine by merely stating the assessment order passed by AO is upheld and that I donot want to interfere with the assessment order In a recent judgment, the ITAT Agra observed that CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing appeal in limine without …

Sale/purchase of jewellery increased substantially on 08.11.2016 after announcement of demonetization – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi Has deleted addition made u/s 69A observing that the sale and purchase of the jewellery was increased substantially after announcement of demonetization on 08.11.2016 …

Assessee should not be disqualified from producing evidence merely for the fact it was not produced before the Assessing Officer (AO) In a recent judgment, the ITAT Ranchi has held that the assessee should not be disqualified from producing evidence merely for the fact it was not produced …

Addition u/s 68 on the premise that cash was deposited 16 days after receipt quashed by ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has quashed the addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank adopting an unreasonable approach that cash was deposited 16 days after the receipt …

Month wise receipt and income slightly more than last year cannot warrant the cash deposited into the bank account as unexplained cash In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur has held that month wise receipt and income slightly more than last year cannot warrant the cash deposited into the …

Affidavits, if credible and corroborated by other evidences, can be sufficient to explain the source of cash deposits -ITAT In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Ahmedabad ITAT has held that affidavits, if credible and corroborated by other evidences, can be sufficient to explain the source of cash deposits. …

Assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account opened by forgery – ITAT  In a recent judgment, ITAT, Delhi has held that assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account being opened by someone else by …