Tag: demonetisation

Business decisions such as withdrawal and redeposit of cash fall within the domain of commercial expediency and AO cannot substitute his own business judgment In A Recent judgment, ITAT Agra has held that business decisions such as withdrawal and redeposit of cash, timing of payments to creditors, or …

Cash book cannot be rejected when availability of stock in trade is not disputed as per stock register which is accepted. Sales out of available stock cannot be disregarded as ingenuine. In a recent judgment, ITAT Amritsar has held that cash book cannot be rejected when availability of …

Addition u/s 69A confirmed as alleged capital contribution by partners was deposited in bank account of assessee not in account of partnership firm In a recent judgment, Andhra Pradesh High Court confirmed addition under section 69A of Income Tax Act as the alleged capital contribution by the partners …

ITAT refuses to accept opening cash as source of cash deposit as assessee was not subject to audit and cash book was just a self-servicing document In a recent judgment, ITAT Rajkot has declined to accept the opening cash as source of cash deposit holding that assessee was …

Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated as income and only estimated profit embedded in these transactions may only be taxed.  In a recent judgment, Rajkot ITAT held that entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated as income and only estimated profit embedded in these transactions …

There is no legal provision which compels a person to necessarily deposit/invest the cash available in hand – ITAT In A recent judgment, ITAT Jabalpur has held that there is no legal provision which compels a person to necessarily deposit/invest the cash available in hand in bank. Keeping …

Addition u/s 68 deleted as time gap between cash withdrawal and cash deposit into bank account was similar to the preceding year, establishing it was a normal feature of the assessee’s business. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Delhi High Court upheld deletion of addition u/s 68 towards cash …

Addition 69A deleted for cash deposit in bank during demonetisation period as the AO did not follow source specific general verification guidelines of CBDT. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh has deleted addition 69A for unexplained cash deposit in bank during demonetisation period as the …

It is well-settled that once the source of cash is explained to be business receipts already accounted for and taxed, addition u/s 68 is unwarranted – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Surat has deleted addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) holding that …

Merely because of no response to notice u/s 133(6) in the manner the AO expected not a basis for making additions – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi held that merely because bank not responded to notice issued u/s 133(6) in the manner the AO expected cannot …