Tag: e-way bill

Wherever assessee had purchased the materials by way of E-way bill such purchases cannot be treated as bogus or non genuine – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that wherever the assessee had purchased the materials by way of E-way bill such purchases cannot be …

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade payment of tax can be attributed. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court held that when goods could not be accommodated in one truck and therefore, loaded …

Mere nondisclosure of place of destination in the documents cannot be a ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act. In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has held that merely non-disclosure of place of destination in the accompanying documents cannot be a ground for seizure of goods …

Penalty confirmed as loading point of the goods loaded in vehicle was different as declared in E- Way Bill which is confirmed by driver and GPS location In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand confirmed penalty as loading point of the goods loaded in vehicle was …

When e-way bill generated prior to detention order, there could not be an intention to evade payment of tax. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has quashed penalty order under section 129(3) of the GST Act as the e-way bill was generated much prior to the …

No penalty u/s 129(3) of GST Act for non-filling of Part -B of the e-way bill due to technical glitch when there was no intention to evade payment of tax In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has held that penalty under section 129(3) of the GST Act …

Expiry of e-way bill before reaching destination will not attribute to intention to evade payment of tax In a recent case, the Allahabad High Court has reiterated that expiry of e-way bill before reaching destination due to breakdown of the vehicle will not attribute to intention to evade …

Mentioning different place of loading of goods in the e-way bill generated from the common portal held violation of section 129 of CGST Act, 2017. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court has held that mentioning different place of loading of goods in the e-way bill generated from …

Seizure of goods justified when e-way bill was not generated immediately on movement of the goods but was generated after the interception of the goods. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court declined to interfere with detention of goods by GST Authorities as e-way bill not generated …

Where goods intercepted in transit not accompanied by e-way bill but also description of goods declared was different and taxable at higher rate, there was an intention to evade tax. In a recent judgment the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that where the goods intercepted in transit …