Tag: cit revision 263
No revision u/s 263 can be done on debatable Issue on applicability of provision of Section 115BBE of the Act to the relevant assessment year – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3810 (2023) (10) (ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Balvinder Singh vs. PCITYogesh Kumar vs. PCIT …
In revision proceedings CIT cannot travel beyond the reasons given in the show-cause notice u/s 263 – Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3809 (2023) (09) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs. Amitabh Bachchan (384 ITR 200) (2016) In the …
Revision u/s 263 was justified due to contradictory stand of assessee on credit card cash payments was left out of examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3802 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT, Shimla Versus Greenworld Corporation 2009 181 Taxman 111 (SC)Mr. Jitendra …
Margin of profits in Arhat business is not strictly comparable with previous years unlike other business ventures. It depends upon agricultural produce which overwhelmingly depends upon vagaries of climate variability and also demand and supply. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3797 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the …
Non verification of source of investment made in mutual funds rendered assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3778 (2023) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Infinity Infotech Parks Ltd vs. DCITNarayan Tatu Rane vs. ITO In the …
Simply because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee in India, would by itself, not imply that the income is taxable in India In a recent judgment ITAT has held that only because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee …
Power of revision u/s 263 cannot be exercised to collect more taxes by bringing income within the ambit of Sections 68/ 69 etc. and applying higher tax rate u/s 115BBE. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3741 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:PCIT vs. Deccan Jewellera (P) Ltd. …
Arbitration award paid by sale of property not cost of improvement – Supreme Court holds assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3699 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 2 SCC 718 (2000) 243 ITR …
Accepting rental income from commercial complex as business income instead of house property was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue- ITAT ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3684 (2023) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary order passed by the PCIT u/s …
Revision u/s 263 to make additions substantively instead of protectively not sustainable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3631 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessment was framed pursuant to search action u/s 132. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions on protective basis in the …
