Tag: cit revision 263
Exemption u/s 54F can not be denied merely making wife & son as co-owners of property In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana has held that merely mentioning the names of his wife and son as joint-owners of the property, would not dis-entitle assessee …
Non-payment cannot be a ground for disallowing the claim of sub-contract expenses – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Indore has held that non-payment cannot be a ground for disallowing the claim of expenses accrued as sub-contractor was to be paid after realization of performance guarantee. ABCAUS …
Merely because no addition is made, assessment cannot be held as erroneous or prejudicial – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Jaipur has held that merely because assessment unit has not made any addition the assessment cannot be considered as erroneous or prejudicial u/s 263. ABCAUS Case …
A consistent view taken by AO can’t be held erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Ahmedabad has held that a consistent view taken by AO can’t be held erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS …
If no addition made in reassessment proceedings on issues as per reasons recorded, AO should drop proceedings instead of passing order In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has held that having recorded the reasons for reopening the assessment and having formed a belief that income of the …
AO cannot be presumed to adopted or chosen a course permissible in law when his order does not speak in that behalf – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Bangalore has confirmed the revisonary order passed by PCIT u/s 263 holding that the Assessing Officer cannot be …
Net Profit rate of 8% not applicable for audit case. Net Profit rate of 6% is reasonable for business of civil construction – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Patna has held that though in the non-audit case, Net Profit rate of 8% is considered as fair …
Pr. CIT u/s 263 empowered to review orders passed by JCIT as Section 263 is inclusive one In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble High Court has held that Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, is inclusive one and include jurisdiction of the Pr.CIT to review the orders …
Deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties made order erroneous and prejudicial – ITAT In a recent judgment, the Mumbai ITAT has upheld the revisionary order u/s 263 where Assessing Officer (AO) allowed deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties. …
Period of limitation for passing Revisionary order u/s 263 to be reckoned from the date of the original assessment order not reassessment order In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court has held that Period of limitation for passing Revisionary order u/s 263 to be reckoned from the …