Tag: cit revision 263
CIT not justified in disturbing consistent method of closing stock valuation by invoking revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2526 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: United Commercial Bank vs. CIT (1999) 240ITR 355 (SC), CIT vs. British Paints …
Brought forward debit balance can not make assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue – ITAT quashes Revisionary Order ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2469 (2018) 08 ITAT In this appeal, the assessee had challenged the correctness of the order of the Principal Commissioner of …
CIT can not substitute his view over the view taken by AO in the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 as AO took one of the possible view ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2454 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against CIT in invoking the …
AO cannot remain quiet after issuing summons u/s 131 which went unanswered. Without resorting to further investigation no adverse inference could be drawn. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2453 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by CIT(A) in upholding …
ITAT’s jurisdiction is not to rewrite the AO’s order and improve upon it. High Court uphelds Revision order passed u/s 263 for lack of enquiry ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2427 (2018) 07 HC The instant appeal had been filed by the Revenue against the order of the …
Revision u/s 263 upheld as AO had not formed any opinion but erroneously allowed the capital expenses as revenue causing a clear prejudice – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2422 (2018) 07 HC The instant appeal was filed by the assesseee against the order of the …
CIT revisional order setting aside dropping of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) by the AO was quashed by ITAT as AO took one of the possible views as per the judgment of Apex Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 2361 (2018) 06 ITAT In the all the cases covered …
CIT u/s 263 can not revise order passed by Commissioner Appeals to examine the same issue as assessment order made by Assessing Officer got merged with the order of the Appellate Commissioner. The instant appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax …
Fresh approval u/s 153D not required in remand case u/s 263 where assessment in search case was originally framed u/s 153A after approval u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act-HC The appeal was filed by the appellant assessee is against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal/ITAT) …
ITAT explains the law on exemption u/s 10(2A) for partners share of profit in the income of the firm. Revision order u/s 263 quashed as it failed to state what kind of enquiry AO failed to make. Prelude: Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) …
