Tag: cit revision 263
Revision order us 263 on conducting additional enquiry on different pattern when AO conducted adequate enquiry and took view permissible in law could not be said to be erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1262 (2017) (05) ITAT Grievance:The appellant …
Revision us 263-Student Development-Capitation Fees not reflected in Income Expenditure Account shown directly in the Balance Sheet held as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1259 (2017) (05) HC Grounds of Appeal: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the …
Revision 263 for non application of section 50C. The order of the AO was held not only erroneous but also prejudicial to the interest of Revenue – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1250 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed …
Revision us 263 set aside as CIT did not do homework. No record was called for examining the issue or application of mind by CIT – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1226 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by …
Lack of enquiry or inadequate enquiry. Revision u/s 263 quashed by ITAT applying the large number of judgments of High Court and Supreme Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1220 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance:The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the revisionary order passed by the Commissioner of Income …
Revisionary order quashed as wrong allowance caused no prejudice to the interest of the Revenue and the twin conditions u/s 263 not satisfied-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1204 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The Appellant was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax …
Revision us 263 on reasons unconnected with grounds of reopening which was for specific purpose. Calcutta High Court upholds revision by CIT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1194 (2017) (04) HC The Substantial Question of Law raised: One of the grounds raised was as under: Whether the Learned …
Legal expenses claim of Salman Khan allowed in set aside proceedings by order of Commissioner of Income Tax under Revision u/s 263 The Hindustan Times in 2015, quoting Salim Khan, father of Salman Khan had reported that Bollywood actor had spent more than Rs 25 crore in the 2002 …
Revision us 263-Use of word appears showed CIT was not sure as to how and in what manner the assessment order passed was without investigation and enquiry-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1121 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 The Grievance: The …
Order us 263 not nullity if notice not signed by CIT, when opportunity of hearing was otherwise given by the Commissioner-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1114 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2010-11 Brief Facts of the Case: In a recent judgment, ITAT, Kolkata dismissed a bunch …