Tag: addition u/s 68
Addition of Mobilization Advances based on gross receipts as per 26AS statement deleted as mobilization advance was offered to tax over the life of the project ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3763 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the Department had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Phenomenal LTCG in short period possible only through a colorable device – ITAT upheld taxing LTCG as income from undisclosed income ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3687 (2023) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Sanjay Bimalchand Jain vs. CITSurya Prakash Toshniwal (HUF) vs ITOCIT vs. Durga …
Addition for cash deposit upheld for absence of cash flow statement/cash book ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3633 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made on account of cash deposit in bank as cash credits …
Investor companies having low income and assets in the form of investments have been created through rotation of money in between the group companies not enough ground to prove that any unaccounted money of the assessee has been introduced in the assessee company warranting addition under section 68 …
No deduction/allowance is allowable against unexplained cash credit u/s 68 which is considered as income of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3599 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT 247 ITR 290 In a recent judgment, the ITAT has held that …
Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation as per High Court order deleted as no sum was actually received ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3545 (2021) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
Ex parte best judgment assessment remanded as the assessee was a defunct company which ceased to function and therefore could not submit documents ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3531 (2021) (07) ITAT In this case appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) confirming addition …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposit prior to issue of cheque by lender deleted as deposit was out of cash withdrawn earlier ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3490 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition u/s …
Addition made for difference due to wrong journal entry. Assessee directed to file reconciliation to explain the difference-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3477 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing …
ITAT remanded invocation of Section 115BBE denying set off of current year loss against income assessed u/s 68. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3470 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sumati Dayal v. CIT reported in (1995) 214 ITR 801(SC)CIT v. Durga Prasad More (1971) 82 ITR 540 …
