Tag: addition u/s 68
No deduction/allowance is allowable against unexplained cash credit u/s 68 which is considered as income of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3599 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT 247 ITR 290 In a recent judgment, the ITAT has held that …
Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation as per High Court order deleted as no sum was actually received ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3545 (2021) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
Ex parte best judgment assessment remanded as the assessee was a defunct company which ceased to function and therefore could not submit documents ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3531 (2021) (07) ITAT In this case appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) confirming addition …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposit prior to issue of cheque by lender deleted as deposit was out of cash withdrawn earlier ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3490 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition u/s …
Addition made for difference due to wrong journal entry. Assessee directed to file reconciliation to explain the difference-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3477 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing …
ITAT remanded invocation of Section 115BBE denying set off of current year loss against income assessed u/s 68. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3470 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sumati Dayal v. CIT reported in (1995) 214 ITR 801(SC)CIT v. Durga Prasad More (1971) 82 ITR 540 …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank during demonetization period deleted as cash was deposited by trade debtors ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3465 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malpani House of Stones Vs CIT (88 taxmaann.com 546) (Raj HC)CIT vs Aggarwal Engg Co. (302 ITR …
Reassessment held bad in law as assessee not given four weeks time to seek legal remedy after rejection of objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3438 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Smt. Kamlesh Goel vs. Income Tax OfficerPr. CIT vs. Sagar DeveloperBharat …
Non-filing of ITRs by lenders can give rise to suspicion for the lack of creditworthiness but not sufficient to draw inference against assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3437 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Chanakya Developers reported 43 taxmann.com 91 In the …
Some tax evasion sought by assessee is a necessary condition for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). What has to be shown is whether, and if so, how, assessee can be said to have sought to evade tax. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3433 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law …
