Tag: reopening 148
Notice u/s 148 issued prior to approval granted by competent authority bad in law In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in as …
CBDT extends time limit for passing order u/s 144C or issuance of notice u/s 148, sending intimation u/s 168(1) linking of PAN to aadhar MINISTRY OF FINANCE(Department of Revenue)(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 20/2021 New Delhi, the 31st March, 2021 S.O.1432(E).—In exercise of the …
CBDT clarifies Instruction on issue of notice u/s 148 for instances considered as potential cases F. No.225/40/2021/ITA-IIGovernment of India Ministry of Finance Department of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi, the 12th March,2021 All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax Madam/Sir, Subject: Instructions regarding selection of cases for …
Addition for cash deposit remanded as bank account was opened by someone else by forging PAN Card and signature of assessee. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3469 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made …
CBDT Instructions on selection of cases for issue of notice u/s 148 to potential cases’ by 31.03.2021 for the A.Y 2013-14 to A.Y 2017-18 F. No.225/40/2021/ITA-IIGovernment of India Ministry of Finance Department of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi, the 4th March, 2021 All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of …
Amendments made to provisions of Income escaping assessment and search assessments by Budget 2021-22. Revised time limit for issuing notice Under the existing provisions, the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may reopen the …
Reassessment held bad in law as assessee not given four weeks time to seek legal remedy after rejection of objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3438 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Smt. Kamlesh Goel vs. Income Tax OfficerPr. CIT vs. Sagar DeveloperBharat …
Some tax evasion sought by assessee is a necessary condition for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). What has to be shown is whether, and if so, how, assessee can be said to have sought to evade tax. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3433 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law …
Incorrect wrong and non-existing reasons recorded for reopening of assessment is non application of mind ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3430 (2020) (12) Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Atlas Cycle Industries 180 ITR 319Pr. CIT vs., SNG Developers Ltd., 404 ITR 312Shamshad Khan vs. ACIT …
Reopening notice u/s 148 on wrong presumption that assessee not filed return of income quashed by Tribunal as non application of mind ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3423 (2020) (11) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Pr. CIT vs. RMG Polyvinyl (2017) 83 taxmann.com 348 (Delhi)/ 396 …
