Tag: reopening 148

Amalgamation order does not take away right of income tax department to proceed against the transferee company, In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has held that simply because the amalgamation order has been passed, the same does not take away right of the income tax department …

Rajasthan High Court quashes notice u/s 148 issued by JAO and not by FAO expressing disagreement with Gujarat High Court judgment. In a recent judgment the Rajasthan High Court quashes notice u/s 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO). Disagrees with Gujarat …

Income tax proceedings relating to the period prior to the approval of the resolution plan infructuous – Supreme Court dismissed Special Leave Petition (SLP) of Revenue Income tax proceedings relating to the period prior to the approval of the resolution plan infructuous as upon completion of the CIRP, …

When AO started the computation of assessed income from the returned income, the return can not be considered non-est for no e-verification In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that when Assessing Officer started the computation of assessed income from the returned income, the return can not …

Failure of AO to draw inferences cannot mean that the petitioner had not disclosed all the material facts – High Court In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court has held that assessee’s duty is only to disclose primary facts and it is for the Assessing Officer (AO) to …

Non response to show-cause notice u/s 148A(b) would not make the otherwise invalid show-cause notice good – High Court In a recent judgment Patna High Court has held that incorrect information furnished in notice u/s 148(A)(b) which was not supported by any material vitiated the proceeding under section …

It is incumbent upon AO to decide the case u/s 148A(d) on the basis of the material on record including the reply of the assessee – High Court In a recent judgment, the Himanchal Pradesh High Court has held that it is incumbent upon the Assessing Officer to …

No infirmity in reopening on the reasoning that no return was filed by the assessee when assessee was using two different PANs, one for bank operation and other for filing ITR – ITAT  In a recent judgment ITAT Allahabad has held that there was no infirmity in the …

Notice u/s 148 sent to some incorrect e-mail ID held as non-est and bad in law. ITAT quashed re-assessment order. In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi held that notice u/s 148 sent to some incorrect e-mail ID was non-est and bad in law. ITAT quashed re-assessment order. ABCAUS …

Reopening u/s 148 was rightly done as income of the company was shifted to partnership firm to avoid tax by setting off bad debts – SLP dismissed by Supreme Court In a recent order/judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP filed by the assessee company against the …