Tag: reopening 148
In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has stated that a concluded assessment can not be reopening u/s 147/148 based on a retrospective amendment in Law as there could not be any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Case Law Details: ITA Nos. …
Writing “Yes, I am Satisfied” establishes non recording of proper satisfaction/approval before issue of notice u/s 148 No sooner than a week after, holding that merely writing “yes” or “approved” and affixing signature by CIT) was not the required satisfaction (ITA No. 5311/Del/2013 dated 07/04/2016), ITAT delhi Bench …
In a latest judgment, ITAT Chandigarh has held that notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 served upon by affixture at a wrong address and consequent re-assessment made under section 147/148 cannot be held to be valid. Case Details: I T A No s . 335 & 336/ CHD/2015 Assessment …
Merely writing yes/approved and affixing signature by CIT is not proper satisfaction for a fit case for re-opening u/s 147 and issue of notice u/s 148 Merely writing “yes” or “approved” and affixing signature by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was not the required/proper satisfied for a fit case …
Reassessment proceedings cannot be resorted to only to examine the facts of a case, no matter how desirable that be unless there is a reason to believe, rather than suspect, that an income has escaped assessment. Case Details: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ITA No.3052/Del./2013 (AY:2004-05) M/s. Excellent …
