Tag: reopening 148
Reopening notice u/s 148 quashed as Revenue was indulging in fishing by way of scrutinizing again something that had been specifically gone into- High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2121 (2017) (11) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Phool Chand Bajrang Lal & …
Reopening notice us 148 against amalgamated company was void ab initio as on that day the company was not in existence. Even if Department was not aware of that fact, will not make any difference to the legal position – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2013 …
Reopening reasons must explain what material was not disclosed which the assessee ought to have disclosed. Explanation-1 of section 147 do not relieves AO of burden of demonstrating the assessee’s failure. Delhi High Court explains the jurisdictional requirement of reopening of income tax cases u/s 14/148 post amendment …
Notice us 148 not invalid if assessee do not challenge it. Settled law is that if assessee chooses not to challenge notice issued it is to be treated as valid – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1210 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee company was …
Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) is illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 and 4 years have lapsed. Soon after the demonetization, the Income Tax Department (‘Department’) had launched a scheme called “operation Clean money” for online verification of cash deposits in …
Additions not related to reasons recorded for reopening not permissible as it was not subject matter of reasons recorded by AO for reopening the assessment – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1183 (2017) (03) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the additions made by …
Non-furnishing reopening reasons despite request vitiates the reopening of assessment. Order passed u/s 148 quashed and declared illegal by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1156 (2017) (03) ITAT Question for determination: Whether non-furnishing of the reasons for reopening, after the specific request for the same is made …
Reassessment notice issued with sanction from JCIT was void as under proviso to sub-section (1) of section 151 sanction was required from CCIT/CIT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1092 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year : 2006-07 Important Case Laws relied upon: CIT VS. SPL’s Siddhartha Ltd. (2012) 345 …
Reopening assessment us 147/148 for verification of details illegal The Assessing Officer merely sought to reopen the assessment for verification of the details, which is not contemplated under section 147 of the Act. This was held by ITAT in a recent judgment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 939 2016 …
AO bound to furnish reopening reasons recorded us 147 within a reasonable time for initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 This was held by ITAT in a recent Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 6611 2016 (06) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee filed his return of …