Tag: reopening 148
Second reopening notice u/s 148 issued without completing earlier reassessment proceedings is invalid ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3370 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:A.S.S.P. & Co. vs. CIT 172 ITR 274 (Mad)CIT vs. P. Krishnankutty Menon, 181 ITR 237 (Ker)Tao Publishing (P) Ltd. …
Assessee not permitted to change head of income as per his own sweet will and convenience. ITAT upheld addition following consistency rule ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3341 (2020) (07) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. v/s CIT, 373 ITR 673 (SC)Rayala …
Section 292BB not applicable to legal representative. High Court quashed reopening notice issued in the name of deceased assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3332 (2020) (07) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Maruti Suzuki India Limited, (2019) 416 ITR 613 …
Non-rejection of explanation in Assessment Order amounts to AO accepting it hence no reopening on change of opinion. SC upholds High Court judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3322 (2020) (06) SC In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the …
Assessee must be put to notice of all provisions on which revenue relies upon. Supreme Court quashed reopening notice u/s 148 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3293 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Claggett Brachi Co. Ltd. London 1989 Supp(2) SCC 182M/s Phool Chand Bajrang …
Reopening quashed as AO not recorded reasons of assesse’s failure to disclose material facts fully and truly but notice u/s 148 was issued on change of opinion ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3236 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. vs. DCITCIT Vs. …
Notice u/s 148 approval recording satisfaction “Yes, I am satisfied on the reasons recorded by the AO that it is a fit case for issue of notice u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act.” invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3228 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by …
Reassessment u/s 148 due to credit card payment. ITAT directed AO to delete the addition made in view of returned income of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3197A (2019) (12) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in the …
Directions u/s 144A does not affect applicability of decision of the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshaft for disposing off objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3173 (2019) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:M/s. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income …
Reopening done at the insistence of CIT held as change of opinion and was vitiated in law as it did not satisfy the legal requirement of Section 147 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3124 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Larsen and …
