Tag: cit revision 263
Revision us 263-Student Development-Capitation Fees not reflected in Income Expenditure Account shown directly in the Balance Sheet held as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1259 (2017) (05) HC Grounds of Appeal: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the …
Revision 263 for non application of section 50C. The order of the AO was held not only erroneous but also prejudicial to the interest of Revenue – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1250 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed …
Revision us 263 set aside as CIT did not do homework. No record was called for examining the issue or application of mind by CIT – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1226 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by …
Lack of enquiry or inadequate enquiry. Revision u/s 263 quashed by ITAT applying the large number of judgments of High Court and Supreme Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1220 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance:The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the revisionary order passed by the Commissioner of Income …
Revisionary order quashed as wrong allowance caused no prejudice to the interest of the Revenue and the twin conditions u/s 263 not satisfied-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1204 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The Appellant was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax …
Revision us 263 on reasons unconnected with grounds of reopening which was for specific purpose. Calcutta High Court upholds revision by CIT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1194 (2017) (04) HC The Substantial Question of Law raised: One of the grounds raised was as under: Whether the Learned …
Legal expenses claim of Salman Khan allowed in set aside proceedings by order of Commissioner of Income Tax under Revision u/s 263 The Hindustan Times in 2015, quoting Salim Khan, father of Salman Khan had reported that Bollywood actor had spent more than Rs 25 crore in the 2002 …
Revision us 263-Use of word appears showed CIT was not sure as to how and in what manner the assessment order passed was without investigation and enquiry-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1121 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 The Grievance: The …
Order us 263 not nullity if notice not signed by CIT, when opportunity of hearing was otherwise given by the Commissioner-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1114 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2010-11 Brief Facts of the Case: In a recent judgment, ITAT, Kolkata dismissed a bunch …
Revisionary power us 263-Merely raising query not sufficient. Blindly accepting only part reply is incorrect assumption of facts and non-application of mind by AO-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1103 (2017) (01) ITAT Assessment Year : 2011-12 Important Case Laws Cited: Anuj Jayendra Shah Vs. PCIT 67 taxmann.com …
