Tag: addition u/s 69A
Addition u/s 69A deleted as there was no difference in the quantity of jewellery found during search and jewellery declared in the wealth tax return. In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad deleted addition u/s 69A as Assessing Officer (AO) made addition only on the basis of value of …
Source of cash deposit being savings and family support plausible to certain extent –ITAT deleted addition on account of cash deposit in bank. In a recent judgment, ITAT Visakhapatnam partly deleted addition for cash deposit in bank considering that the assessee’s submission regarding accumulation of savings and receipt …
CIT(A) can not dismiss appeal in limine by merely stating the assessment order passed by AO is upheld and that I donot want to interfere with the assessment order In a recent judgment, the ITAT Agra observed that CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing appeal in limine without …
No addition can be made merely for time gap between withdrawals and redeposits into bank – ITAT In a recent judgment, Hon’ble ITAT Kolkata deleted addition for cash deposit in bank due to time gap between the withdrawals and redeposits into same bank without any findings of fact …
Addition confirmed by High Court as assessee failed to rebut presumption drawn u/s 68 rws 69A In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court confirmed the addition for cash deposit in bank account as AO, CIT(A) and ITAT gave concurrent finding that the assessee did not produce any …
ITAT followed recent decision of High Court to held that approval u/s 151 by JCIT by merely recording as ‘yes’ was bad in law. In a recent order, ITAT Delhi following a recent decision of the High Court held that approval u/s 151 by JCIT by merely recording …
Nobody would withdraw cash and keep it idle for a long period – ITAT uphold addition for cash deposit In a recent judgment, the ITAT Surat has rejected the cash withdrawal made one year prior as source of cash deposit in bank holding that it cannot be accepted …
Assessee should not be disqualified from producing evidence merely for the fact it was not produced before the Assessing Officer (AO) In a recent judgment, the ITAT Ranchi has held that the assessee should not be disqualified from producing evidence merely for the fact it was not produced …
Cash surrendered during survey not covered by deeming provisions of section 69 and 69A – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Amritsar has held that excess cash found and surrendered during survey was not covered by deeming provisions of section 69 and 69A hence not taxable at higher …
Rotations from Auto Sweep A/c not fresh investments-Addition deleted In a recent judgment, ITAT Mumbai has deleted the addition u/s 68 observing that as alleged there were no fresh investments/deposits in bank account except amount along with interest being rotated several times through auto sweep in the current …