Tag: addition u/s 69A
Delay in filing appeal condoned as assessee was not a tech savvy person and could not see notice sent to email mentioned in Form No. 35 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3730 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Addition u/s 69A for cash gifts received on the occasion of marriage and deposited in bank deleted ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3715 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the ational Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/CIT(A) in confirming the addition u/s …
Assessee cannot be asked to explain the bank transactions of an unrelated party – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3707 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition representing alleged unexplained gold …
NFAC passes copy paste order narrating wrong facts. ITAT deleted addition towards cash deposits u/s 69A ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3696 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Chuharmal Vs CIT (1988) 172 ITR 250Smt. Srilekha Banerjee and others vs CIT 1964 AIR 697Rajendran & …
Sales & collection of sundry debtors in SBN during demonetization period held to be assessee’s own money ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3665 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Apex Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (135 Taxmann.com 286)Pr. CIT vs. Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (134 Taxmann.com 256)Madheswara Agencies vs. …
40 percent deduction for cash deposit in undisclosed bank account was very liberal as no details/evidences of expenses submitted by assessee says ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3635 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in partly confirming …
When appeal is pending before CIT(A), revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 can not be exercised – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3612 (2022) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Smt. Renuka Philip vs. ITO 409 ITR 567 (Mad)CIT vs. Vam Resorts and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. 418 …
ITAT admits additional evidences as assessee died before assessment proceedings and it could not be collected in time by legal heirs ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3595 (2022) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in restricting the addition made …
AO not allowed to make addition in the hands of the housewives for cash deposit in bank during demonetization if less than 2.5 lakhs ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3520 (2021) (07) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) National Faceless …
Addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposited in bank account of the assessee in excess of his yearly salary income deleted In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards the difference …