Tag: addition u/s 69A
Addition for cash payments made to builder for purchase of residential house – ITAT deletes addition for want of any clinching evidence ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3787 (2023) (08) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Dinesh Kumar Goyal vs. UOI & Others 453 ITR 535Laxmi Narain Agency vs. Income …
Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
Assessee committed fraud by applying registration u/s 12AA without surrendering earlier PAN issued as firm in the very same name – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3751 (2023) (05) HC The Petitioner assessee had challenged the assessment order passed making addition towards unexplained money u/s 69A of …
Bitumen not valuable article u/s 69A as it requires ownership in large quantity to treat it valuable – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3742 (2023) (05) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:Dhirajlal Haridas v. Commissioner of Income TaxCommissioner of Income Tax v. Amrit lal ChunilalKotak Mahindra Bank …
Delay in filing appeal condoned as assessee was not a tech savvy person and could not see notice sent to email mentioned in Form No. 35 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3730 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Addition u/s 69A for cash gifts received on the occasion of marriage and deposited in bank deleted ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3715 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the ational Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/CIT(A) in confirming the addition u/s …
Assessee cannot be asked to explain the bank transactions of an unrelated party – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3707 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition representing alleged unexplained gold …
NFAC passes copy paste order narrating wrong facts. ITAT deleted addition towards cash deposits u/s 69A ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3696 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Chuharmal Vs CIT (1988) 172 ITR 250Smt. Srilekha Banerjee and others vs CIT 1964 AIR 697Rajendran & …
Sales & collection of sundry debtors in SBN during demonetization period held to be assessee’s own money ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3665 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Apex Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (135 Taxmann.com 286)Pr. CIT vs. Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (134 Taxmann.com 256)Madheswara Agencies vs. …
40 percent deduction for cash deposit in undisclosed bank account was very liberal as no details/evidences of expenses submitted by assessee says ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3635 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in partly confirming …