Tag: cit revision 263
Exemption u/s 54F allowed though Capital Gain sale proceed deposited in Nationalised Bank instead of capital gain deposit scheme account ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3530 (2021) (07) ITAT In this case appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) sustaining the addition made by …
CIT assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 has no power to direct initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) CIT Revision u/s 263 for AO accepting revised return without initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) quashed by ITAT following jurisdictional High Court order In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary …
CIT Revision u/s 263 for failure of AO to convert limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny quashed as no credible material was available In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) passed by the CIT. The …
Sale of property was long term capital gain as assessee held it from the date of advance payment and balance payment was only a follow up action ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3502 (2021) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referredCIT vs A Suresh Rao 223 Taxmann 228 (Kar)Principal …
CIT Revision u/s 263 order not mentioning twin conditions of being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue quashed ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3494 (2021) (04) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malabar Industrial Co. vs. CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC)CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR …
Revision u/s 263 on issues not covered under limited scrutiny quashed as AO could not had gone into other issues ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3483 (2021) (04) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sanjib Kumar KhemkaM/s Chengmari Tea Co. Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the …
Inadequate enquiry or insufficient material on record cannot be a ground to invoke powers under Section 263 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3406 (2020) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT 243 ITR 833CIT vs. Max India Ltd. 295 …
Revision u/s 263 to exclude issues settled in Vivad se Vishvas Scheme 2020. ITAT directs AO not to consider capital gains from penny stock while passing fresh order ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3396 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Price Water House vs ACIT …
Taking a view should be backed by reasons in the order itself with evidences and independent enquiry. ITAT upheld revision order passed u/s 263 ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3385 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Rampyari Devi Sarogi vs CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 …
Deeming provision of section 68 not apply if no sum is received in terms of any money, i.e., in cash or cheque. credit worthiness not required to be examined in such case In the given case, the Income Tax Department had challenged the judgment of the Hon’ble High …
