Category: Judgments
Exemption u/s 54B denied for investment in agricultural land made in the name of wife. ITAT followed decision of jurisdictional High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3748 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied uponCIT vs Dinesh Verma 60 taxmann.com 461 (P&H)Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Vegetable Products …
Income Tax relief u/s 90 for tax paid in a foreign country can not be denied for mere delay in filing Form No. 67 as the provision not mandatory but directory- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3747 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Hertz Software India (P.) …
Merely because assessee accepted disallowance made by Assessing Officer, it cannot automatically lead to conclusion that assessee under reported income under Section 270A – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3746 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in …
Disallowance u/s 50C can not be made by CPC by adjustment u/s 143(1) as it infringes statutory right of objection provided in section 50C – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3745 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
There is no provision in the Income Tax Act to tax the difference between value of jewellery declared and jewellery found in search as deemed sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3744 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Deduction u/s 35(2AB) allowed as Form 3CL was issued late by the competent authority . Form 3CL issued by competent authority can not be ignored – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3743 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
Bitumen not valuable article u/s 69A as it requires ownership in large quantity to treat it valuable – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3742 (2023) (05) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:Dhirajlal Haridas v. Commissioner of Income TaxCommissioner of Income Tax v. Amrit lal ChunilalKotak Mahindra Bank …
Power of revision u/s 263 cannot be exercised to collect more taxes by bringing income within the ambit of Sections 68/ 69 etc. and applying higher tax rate u/s 115BBE. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3741 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:PCIT vs. Deccan Jewellera (P) Ltd. …
Late fee u/s 234F for delay in filing of ITR deleted as CPC erred in considering due date applicable to the partner assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3740 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) NFAC in confirming …
Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 wrongly claimed under section 54F allowed being bonafide typographical mistake ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3739 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:ITO v Anirudh Ashok JajooShrikar Hotels (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax 79 taxmann.com 63Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Natraj Stationery Products …
