Category: ITAT
Delay in filing of Tax Audit Report due to computer data crash- Penalty u/s 271B quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3673 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre in confirming income tax penalty u/s 271B …
Onus was not on Revenue to demonstrate that the assessee paid commission, but on the assessee to demonstrate that he had paid no commission on admitted accommodation entry. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3672 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties: In the instant case, the …
Loan obtained preceded by cash deposit of exact amount in lenders account held to be cash credit u/s 68 as the explanation offered was not found to be satisfactory ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3671 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed …
Adhoc disallowance of estimated expenses was justified in the absence of substantiation of expenses by assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3670 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Bhawani Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee had …
IBC has overriding affect on all the acts including Income Tax Act as specifically provided u/s 178(6) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3669 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, both the Revenue and the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) for two Assessment Years. The …
Loss on investment written off not capital gain and hence not covered by exception to monetary limits for filing appeal ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3667 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in allowing capital loss arising out …
Denial of deduction u/s 11 not filing of Audit Report in Form 10B within due date. The CIT(A) to wait till disposal of condonation application pending before CIT(Exemption) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3666 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Sales & collection of sundry debtors in SBN during demonetization period held to be assessee’s own money ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3665 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Apex Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (135 Taxmann.com 286)Pr. CIT vs. Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (134 Taxmann.com 256)Madheswara Agencies vs. …
Penalty u/s 270A can not be imposed without first disposing application in Form No. 68 for immunity from penalty ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3664 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless …
ITAT deleted penalty 271(1)(b) and 271F as explanation of the assessee was ignored by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3663 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless …
