Category: ITAT
Non application of correct section is a classic example of non-application of mind by Quasi-judicial authority – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 In a recent judgment ITAT Raipur deleted addition made under section 69 instead of correct section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) holding …
It is well-settled that once the source of cash is explained to be business receipts already accounted for and taxed, addition u/s 68 is unwarranted – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Surat has deleted addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) holding that …
ITAT confirmed addition u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure over and above Gross Profit addition In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad confirmed addition under section 69C as unexplained expenditure over and above the GP addition holding that the two additions serve different purposes i.e. one addresses the unexplained nature …
Exemption u/s 54F allowed holding that assessee was owner of only one house at the time of transfer and became owner of second house property only after mutation In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has allowed capital gain exemption u/s 54F holding that assessee was owner of only …
Assessment quashed as the return of income was filed by the assessee was above Rs.10 lacs, for which, the jurisdiction vested only with the DCIT/ACIT and not with ITO. In a recent judgment, ITAT Raipur quashed assessment as the return of income was filed by the assessee above …
Uncorroborated WhatsApp message, in the absence of any independent supporting evidence, cannot constitute a valid basis for initiating proceedings under section 153C of the Act – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Mumbai deleted addition under section 69A of the Act on account of alleged cash received over …
Exemption u/s 54F allowed by ITAT holding that investment in purchase of plot in the name of the spouse and their respective shares is immaterial In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has allowed exemption u/s 54F observing that entire investment in purchase of plot is in the name …
Addition u/s 68 deleted as identity of loan givers established and assessee was not beneficiary as loan was repaid in subsequent year. In a recent judgment ITAT Mumbai deleted addition under section 68 as the assessee had furnished requisite material showing identity of loan givers and assessee was …
Joining lands and entering development agreement amounted to business as owners who were brother were also directors in the builder company In a recent judgment, ITAT Jodhpur has held that activity of joining the lands and constructing houses thereon amounted to adventure in the nature of trade as …
The deductor not required to act as an investigator or auditor to conduct any factual verification of the transporter’s declarations under section 194C(6) In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh has held that provisions of section 194C(6) did not require the deductor to examine balance sheets, registration certificates, …
