Category: ITAT
Deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties made order erroneous and prejudicial – ITAT In a recent judgment, the Mumbai ITAT has upheld the revisionary order u/s 263 where Assessing Officer (AO) allowed deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties. …
Cash deposit in bank account belonging to HUF can not be added to the income of individual assessee – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Raipur has deleted addition u/s 69A holding that cash deposit in bank account belonging to HUF and disclosed in the return of …
There is no under reporting of income when tax paid u/s 115JB is more than normal tax – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has deleted penalty u/s 270A(9) holding that there is no underreporting of income when tax is paid on deemed MAT income u/s …
Cash deposit in bank – AO duty bound to show cash earlier withdrawn was spent – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT has deleted addition u/s 69A for cash deposit in bank holding that AO is duty bound to conduct enquiry to show that cash earlier withdrawn …
Order declaring return invalid u/s 139(9) of Income Tax Act not appealable In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble ITAT Rajkot has held that order passed declaring return of income invalid under section 139(9) of the Income Tax Act 1961 is not appealable and consequently the appeal filed by …
Proceedings u/s 269SS for levy of penalty u/s 271D are independent proceedings- ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Cuttack has held that proceedings u/s 269SS for levy of penalty u/s 271D are independent proceedings and are not related to assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 4038 (2024) …
CSR Expenses though not allowed u/s 37 however allowable deduction u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act 1961 – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Rajkot has held that CSR Expenses, even though not allowed u/s 37 of the Income Tax Act, however, the CSR expenditure is …
Large cash seized from State not where business is carried is unexplained income In a recent judgment, the ITAT Pune has held given the facts, that large amount of cash seized from the assessee at State other than where he carried business can not be accepted as business …
Only undisputed tax liability is to be paid before filing appeal to CIT(A)-ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has that objective of section 249(4)(a) is to ensure undisputed tax liability is paid before filing appeal. Self-assessment tax paid as per Return of Income is proper compliance of …
Assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account opened by forgery – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT, Delhi has held that assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account being opened by someone else by …