Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal
In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that an Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5154 (2026) (05) abacus.in ITAT
Important Case Laws relied upon by Parties
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the Final Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w. Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).
Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the impugned assessment order deserved to be quashed as there was no signature either digital or manual found in the Final Assessment Order. Thus, it was submitted that the impugned assessment order is unauthenticated, therefore, the same was in violation and non-est and deserved to be set aside.
The Tribunal observed that the Assessment Order did not contain the signature of the officer who passed the said assessment order.
The Tribunal further observed that an identical situation came up for consideration by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal
The Co-ordinate Bench observed that signing of an assessment order by the Assessing Officer is a mandatory requirement and not merely a procedural formality. Unless, the order is signed it cannot be said to be complete. Once the order is signed digitally or manually, as required, the order is complete and the date of signature on the order shall be the date of passing of the order.
It was held that non singing of an assessment order is not a procedure flaw that can be cured subsequently after service of the same on the Assessee. Thus, it was held that such Assessment Order becomes non-est and invalid.
Following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, the Tribunal held that the unsigned impugned Assessment Order is a non-est and the same is illegal.
Accordingly, the impugned assessment order was quashed.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
- Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal
- Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT
- Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD
- State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board
- Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT
