Category: ITAT
ITAT quashed order passed by PCIT u/s 263 without mentioning specific Section under which AO should have made the addition In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 without mentioning the specific charging Section under which the AO should …
Assessee entitled to claim deduction u/s 48 of housing loan interest paid for remaining amount over and above already claimed u/s 24(b) of the Income Tax Act. In A recent judgment, ITAT Surat has held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s 48 of housing loan …
Show cause notice dropped in e-filing portal requiring reply on the same date was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. In a recent judgment, ITAT Visakhapatnam has quashed order u/s 263 holding that show cause notice dropped in the e-filing portal account of the assessee …
Penalty u/s 271AAC deleted by ITAT as income surrendered was declared in revised return substituting original return. In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur deleted Penalty u/s 271AAC as income surrendered in survey u/s 133A by the assessee was declared in revised return filed which substituted the original return …
ITAT deleted addition for cash deposited in bank account where return of income was filed u/s 44AD of the Income Tax Act In a recent judgment, ITAT Guwahati deleted addition u/s 69A on account of cash deposited in bank account out of sales, of which return of income …
Exemption u/s 11 can not be denied for belated filing of revised Form 10B when original Form 10B was filed within due date – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has held that benefit of exemption u/s 11 can not be denied on the ground of belated …
Escapement of income is to be examined in the original return and not the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has quashed the reassessment order observing that the issue whether the assessee has underdeclared income …
When Trust had no activities, it was incumbent upon the CIT(E) to evaluate such explanation objectively then rejecting application for registration. In a recent judgment, ITAT Rajkot has held that when the trust has explicitly stated that it has not filed returns as it had no activities and …
Merely because of no response to notice u/s 133(6) in the manner the AO expected not a basis for making additions – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi held that merely because bank not responded to notice issued u/s 133(6) in the manner the AO expected cannot …
Interest paid on delayed payment of GST/VAT is compensatory and not penal in nature for allowability under section 37. In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that interest paid on delayed remittance of GST / VAT is compensatory and not penal in nature for the purpose of …