ICAI

ICAI debars five Chartered Accountants found guilty of Professional Misconduct  

ICAI debars five Chartered Accountants found guilty of Professional Misconduct.

In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of ICAI.

Particulars of CA Punishment
CA. G Selvaraj, (M. No. 204231), Plot No 44, Thiruvalluvar Street, Athikulam Main Road, Near Manamahil Cable TV Office, MADURAI (Tamilnadu) – 625007 Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of one month with effect from 30th August, 2024
CA. Piyush Dadhich (M. No. 231485), GF3-A, Sai Vihar Apartments, Old Manipal Hospital Road, Pattanagere Village, Rajarajeshwari Nagar BENGALURU- 560098 Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of one hundred twenty days ( 90 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024
CA. Santhosh D N (M. No. 252502), Yeshwanthapura, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, BENGALURU 563130 Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 03 years and 30 days (03 years plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024
CA. Karthik Mohan (Membership No. 243159), NO 16/2, National High School Road, Visveshwarapuram, Near Kamat Hotel, BENGALURU- 560004 Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of 02 months with effect from 30th August, 2024
CA. Parameswari D (M. No. 214838), New no-1/8 (Old no-19/12), Raja Naicken Street, Vanagaram, CHENNAI 600095 Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 90 days ( 60 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024

Note: Addition debar period has been invoked due to non payment of fine imposed.

Download ICAI Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80P denied as return not filed u/s 139(1) but in response to notice u/s 148

Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…

4 hours ago
  • GST

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income

Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers

Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Compliance history of supplier can’t be used to invalidate genuine business transactions of buyer

Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…

2 days ago