ICAI debars five Chartered Accountants found guilty of Professional Misconduct.
In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of ICAI.
| Particulars of CA | Punishment |
| CA. G Selvaraj, (M. No. 204231), Plot No 44, Thiruvalluvar Street, Athikulam Main Road, Near Manamahil Cable TV Office, MADURAI (Tamilnadu) – 625007 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of one month with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Piyush Dadhich (M. No. 231485), GF3-A, Sai Vihar Apartments, Old Manipal Hospital Road, Pattanagere Village, Rajarajeshwari Nagar BENGALURU- 560098 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of one hundred twenty days ( 90 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Santhosh D N (M. No. 252502), Yeshwanthapura, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, BENGALURU 563130 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 03 years and 30 days (03 years plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Karthik Mohan (Membership No. 243159), NO 16/2, National High School Road, Visveshwarapuram, Near Kamat Hotel, BENGALURU- 560004 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of 02 months with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Parameswari D (M. No. 214838), New no-1/8 (Old no-19/12), Raja Naicken Street, Vanagaram, CHENNAI 600095 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 90 days ( 60 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
Note: Addition debar period has been invoked due to non payment of fine imposed.
Download ICAI Notification Click Here >>
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…