ICAI debars five Chartered Accountants found guilty of Professional Misconduct.
In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of ICAI.
| Particulars of CA | Punishment |
| CA. G Selvaraj, (M. No. 204231), Plot No 44, Thiruvalluvar Street, Athikulam Main Road, Near Manamahil Cable TV Office, MADURAI (Tamilnadu) – 625007 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of one month with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Piyush Dadhich (M. No. 231485), GF3-A, Sai Vihar Apartments, Old Manipal Hospital Road, Pattanagere Village, Rajarajeshwari Nagar BENGALURU- 560098 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of one hundred twenty days ( 90 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Santhosh D N (M. No. 252502), Yeshwanthapura, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, BENGALURU 563130 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 03 years and 30 days (03 years plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Karthik Mohan (Membership No. 243159), NO 16/2, National High School Road, Visveshwarapuram, Near Kamat Hotel, BENGALURU- 560004 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a period of 02 months with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
| CA. Parameswari D (M. No. 214838), New no-1/8 (Old no-19/12), Raja Naicken Street, Vanagaram, CHENNAI 600095 | Name of CA removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 90 days ( 60 days plus additional 30 days) with effect from 30th August, 2024 |
Note: Addition debar period has been invoked due to non payment of fine imposed.
Download ICAI Notification Click Here >>
- ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees
- PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO
- Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence
- When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken
- EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC
