ICAI

No bar on acceptance of more than 15% fees from a single client- ICAI Clarification

No bar on acceptance of more than 15% fees from a single client by chartered accountants – ICAI Clarifies that only requirement is of disclosure

ICAI Announcement

Sub. : Clarification on Fees from a single client

As the members are aware, the revised Code of Ethics will come into effect w.e.f 1st July, 2020.

Some members have expressed their concern on one of the provisions contained in Paragraph R410.4 of the Volume-I of revised Code of Ethics on measures for addressing self-interest threats resulting from dependence of Fees from a single client.

It may be clarified that there is NOT a bar in the revised Code of Ethics on acceptance of more than 15% fees from a single client. There is only requirement of disclosure , and taking safeguards prescribed therein, if the total gross annual professional fees from the audit client and its related entities represent more than 15% of the total fees received by the firm expressing the opinion on the financial statements of the client for two consecutive years.

Accordingly, the Audit may be continued while taking safeguards as mentioned in the said Paragraph.

It may further be clarified that this rule would not apply in Case of audit of Government Companies, public undertakings, nationalized banks, public financial institutions or where appointments are made by Government; OR where the total gross annual fees of the Firm does not exceed five lakhs of rupees.

It may also be relevant to note that the rule applies ONLY where such Fees is received from an AUDIT CLIENT

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT can’t restrict power of CIT u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years – High Court

CBDT Circular can’t restrict powers of Income Tax Authority u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years In a recent…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan

Benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan allowed as assessee fulfilled conditions of CBDT Circular…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Ambiguous penalty notices cannot be foundation of imposition of any penalty – SC

Ambiguous notices without striking off the irrelevant limb cannot be the foundation of imposition of any penalty – Supreme Court…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court upheld application of peak…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Actual use of asset is not the sole test for allowability of depreciation – ITAT

Actual use of asset not the sole test for allowability of depreciation and it may be allowed when business only…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

1 week ago