Income Tax

Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for personal use of telephone, car deleted in the absence of any finding of fact

Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for personal use of vehicle telephone deleted as AO did not bring any finding of fact against the assessee on record-ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2413 (2018) 07 ITAT

The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the ad hoc disallowance made by the Assessing Officer assuming personal use of telephone, car etc.

The AO observed that the assessee had debited a huge amount towards expenses on account of telephone, travelling and conveyance, vehicle expenses and repair and maintenance. The AO noted that in the computation of income no amount on account of personal use of the assets/facilities by the assessee and their family members had been added back by the assessee.

The AO was of the opinion that the issue of non-business use of these expenses could not be ruled-out completely. Therefore he disallowed 1/10th of the expenditure and made the addition.

The assessee challeneged the addition before the CIT(A) as highly unreasonable. However the addition was confirmed.  

The Tribunal opined that the addition was wholly unjustified as the AO had not pointed out as to which was personal expenditure incurred by the assessee and merely because no amount had been added back by the assessee for personal use was no ground to make adhoc addition.

The ITAT opined that if the AO wanted to disbelieve the explanation of assessee, he should have brought some finding of fact against the assessee on record. Otherwise, on mere presumption adhoc addition was not justified.

Accordingly, the addition was set aside.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago