Addition made for low house hold withdrawals from capital upheld by ITAT rejecting the explanation of of joint family living and expenses
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2492 (2018) 08 ITAT
The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in inter alia confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of low house hold drawings / withdrawals.
The assessee’s family consisted of four members and no drawing / withdrawal was made from the capital account towards household expenses. The AO, therefore, estimated the household expenses of the assessee and accordingly made addition to the total income of the assessee.
The CIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer on the ground that although there was household withdrawal in capital account in the immediately preceding assessment year, however, there was no such withdrawal during the impugned assessment year.
The explanation of the assessee that his family is residing in a common house with common kitchen with his brother and the household expenses were met out from his withdrawals was rejected by the CIT(A).
The Tribunal opined that the assessee in the instant case had not shown any withdrawal from his capital account towards household expenses, therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A), did not call for any interference.
Accordingly, the ground raised by the assessee was dismissed.
ITAT allows depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi allows depreciation on highway…
Once assessee satisfies conditions mentioned in section 270AA, the Assessing Officer would be bound to grant immunity In a recent…
NTPC invited applications from CA/CMA as young professionals to join NTPC Projects/Stations as Executive Trainee, Finance. NTPC Limited has invited…
Allahabad High Court disposes GST appeals observing that the functioning of GST Appellate Tribunal are put to motion Allahabad High…
Date of dispatch of notice as per ITBA portal and date of communication by email may not necessarily be the…
In a recent judgment, Bombay High Court held that assignment of leasehold rights for consideration would not amount to supply…