Income Tax

Additional Charges in the grade of CCIT, Chennai, Madurai, Kolkata

Additional Charges in the grade of CCIT, Chennai, Madurai, Kolkata

F.No.  A-22011/2/2018-Ad.VI-(Part)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)

North Block, New Delhi The 31st August , 2018

OFFICE ORDER NO. 145 OF 2018

The following officers in the grade of CCIT are, hereby, ordered to hold the charge(s) indicated against their names, in addition to their substantive charge/additional charge (s), if any , being held by them , with effect from 01.09.2018 and until further orders:

S.No. Civil Code No. Name of the Officer & Designation Additional Charge
1 83009 Shri Sushil Kumar, Pr. CCIT, Tamilnadu & Puducherry, Chennai CCIT (TDS), Chennai
2 83055 Shri T.P. Krishna Kumar, CCIT, Coimbatore CCIT, Madurai
3 85057 Shri Kana Ram Meghwal, CCIT (TDS), Kolkata CCIT-5, Kolkata and CCIT-4, Kolkata

2. The officers assigned to hold additional charge shall not be eligible for any claim to additional remuneration under the provision of FR-49.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow.

(Yogesh)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-2309-5474

Copy to:

  1. Officers Concerned
  2. Principal CCsIT, Chennai / Kolkata
  3. All Principal Chief Commissioners/ Principal Directors General of Income Tax
  4. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts , New Delhi
  5. Zonal Accounts Officer , CBDT, C/o Principal CCIT concerned .
  6. PSs to FM / MOS (Finance).
  7. PPSs to Finance Secretary / Secy. (Revenue) / Chairman, CBDT / Members , CBDT / JS (Admn.) CBDT / JS(Revenue).
  8. Adviser to FM.
  9. Hindi Section for Hindi version .
  10. Secretary General, ITGOA / IRS Association / Income Tax Employees Federation (ITEF) / All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association.
  11. Commissioner of  Income Tax (Media & TP) and Official Spokesperson , CBDT, North Block, New Delhi
  12. Database Cell, CBDT, New Delhi
Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

17 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

4 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago