Income Tax

Arm’s Length Price allowable variation limits u/s 92C notified for AY 2025-26

Arm’s Length Price allowable variation limits u/s 92C notified for AY 2025-26

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No.157/2025

New Delhi, the 6th November, 2025

Income Tax

S.O. 5053(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereafter referred to as the said Act) read with the proviso to sub-rule (7) of rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm’s length price determined under section 92C of the said Act and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed, (i) one per cent. of the latter in respect of wholesale trading; and (ii) three per cent. of the latter in all other cases — the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken shall be deemed to be the arm’s length price for the assessment year 2025-2026.

Explanation.- For the purposes of this notification, “wholesale trading” means an international transaction or specified domestic transaction of trading in goods, which fulfils the following conditions, namely:-

a. purchase cost of finished goods is eighty per cent. or more of the total cost pertaining to such trading activities; and

b. average monthly closing inventory of such goods is ten per cent. or less of sales pertaining to such trading activities.

[No.157/2025/F. No. 500/1/2014-APA-II]

KARTHIK CHEBOLI, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD)(APA-I)FT&TR -I, CBDT

Explanatory Memorandum: The notification provides for tolerance range of one per cent. for wholesale trading and three per cent. in all other cases for the assessment year 2025-2026. It is certified that none will be adversely affected by the retrospective effect being given to the notification.

Download Notification No.157/2025 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago