Arm’s Length Price allowable variation limits u/s 92C notified for AY 2025-26

Arm’s Length Price allowable variation limits u/s 92C notified for AY 2025-26

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No.157/2025

New Delhi, the 6th November, 2025

Income Tax

S.O. 5053(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereafter referred to as the said Act) read with the proviso to sub-rule (7) of rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm’s length price determined under section 92C of the said Act and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed, (i) one per cent. of the latter in respect of wholesale trading; and (ii) three per cent. of the latter in all other cases — the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken shall be deemed to be the arm’s length price for the assessment year 2025-2026.

Explanation.- For the purposes of this notification, “wholesale trading” means an international transaction or specified domestic transaction of trading in goods, which fulfils the following conditions, namely:-

a. purchase cost of finished goods is eighty per cent. or more of the total cost pertaining to such trading activities; and

b. average monthly closing inventory of such goods is ten per cent. or less of sales pertaining to such trading activities.

[No.157/2025/F. No. 500/1/2014-APA-II]

KARTHIK CHEBOLI, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD)(APA-I)FT&TR -I, CBDT

Explanatory Memorandum: The notification provides for tolerance range of one per cent. for wholesale trading and three per cent. in all other cases for the assessment year 2025-2026. It is certified that none will be adversely affected by the retrospective effect being given to the notification.

Download Notification No.157/2025 Click Here >>

• AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT
• FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied
• Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company
• Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court
• High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA