Income Tax

Assessment Order can not be passed if objections are pending before DRP – High Court

Assessment Order can not be passed if the objections filed by the assessee are pending before the DRP – High Court

In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that notwithstanding the lack of information with the AO, if an objection has been filed and is pending before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), the Assessment Order passed in ignorance of the said objections, is required to be set-aside.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
4349 (2024) (12) abcaus.in HC Delhi

In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition challenging the Final Assessment Order passed under Section 143(3) read with 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act)  on it being without jurisdiction as the same was passed without waiting for the decision of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

The case of the assessee was reopened and show cause notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act was issued calling upon the Assessee to show cause as to why the receipts should not be taxed as interest income during the year under consideration.

The Assessee submitted its response to the said show cause notice. The AO subsequently passed the Draft Assessment Order proposing an addition on account of treating lease rentals received by the Assessee as interest income and proposed penalty as well.

Aggrieved by the Draft Assessment Order, the Assessee filed its objections in Form No.35A with the DRP.

Notwithstanding that the Assessee’s objections were pending before the DRP, the AO passed the impugned Final Assessment Order re-computing the income of the Assessee in line with draft assessment order.

Before the Hon’ble High Court, the assessee contended that the AO had no jurisdiction to pass the impugned Final Assessment Order keeping in view the pendency of the objections before the DRP. The Assessee further contended that the AO could not have extinguished the right of the assessee to get its objections disposed of by the DRP by passing the impugned Final Assessment Order. The Assessee also contended that no real time alert was sent to its registered e-mail Id.

In support of its contentions, the assessee relied upon several judgments whereby in identical situation this Court had remitted the matter to the DRP for consideration as per procedure laid out in terms of Section 144(C) of the Act. According to the Assessee, it was no more res integra that the respondent department is mandated to act in accordance with the procedure stipulated in Section 144(C) of the Act and await the decision of the DRP before passing the Final Assessment Order, even in cases where the AO has not been notified by the Assessee, as long as the objections before the DRP have been submitted within time.

The Hon’ble High Court opined that it is an admitted position that, notwithstanding the lack of information with the AO, if an objection has been filed and is pending before the DRP, the Assessment Order passed in ignorance of the said objections, is required to be set-aside.

Accordingly, the petition was allowed and the impugned Final Assessment Order was set-aside.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

23 hours ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago