Income Tax

Bad debt written off claim us 361vii -Assessee need not establish if written off in books of accounts of assessee as irrecoverable-CBDT Circular-12/2016

Bad debt written off claim us 361vii

Circular No. 12/2016

F.No.279/Misc./140/20  15-ITJ
Government of India

Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi , Dated 30th May, 2016

Subject:- Admissibility of claim of deduction of Bad Debt under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961- reg.

Proposals have been received by the Central Board of Direct Taxes regarding filing of appeals/pursuin g litigation on the issue of allowability of bad debt that are written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. The dispute relates to cases involving failure on the part of assessee to establish that the debt is irrecoverable.

2. Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 amended the provisions of sections 36(1)(vii ) and 36(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (hereafter referred to as the Act) to rationalize the provisions regarding allowability of bad debt with effect from the 1st April , 1989.

3. The legislative intention behind the amendment was to eliminate litigation on the issue of the allowability of the bad debt by doing away with the requirement for the assessee to establish that the debt, has in fact, become irrecoverable. However, despite the amendment, disputes on the issue of allowability continue , mostly for the reason that the debt has not been established to be irrecoverable. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Ltd. In CA Nos. 5292 to 5294 of 2003 vide judgment  dated 9.2.2010 (available in NJRS 2010 LL-209-08) , has stated that the position of law is well  settled.  “Afte1.4.1989, for allowing deduction for the amount of any bad debt or part thereof under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, it is not necessary for assessee to establish that the debt, in fact has become irrecoverable; it is enough if bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the books of accounts of assessee.”

4. In  view of the above, claim for any debt or part thereof in any previous  year,  shall be admissible under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, if it is written off as irrecoverable in the  books of accounts of the assessee for that previous year and it fulfills the conditions stipulated in  sub section (2) of sub-section 36(2) of the Act.

5.  Accordingly , no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground and appeals already filed, if any, on this issue before various Courts/Tribunals may be withdrawn /not pressed  upon.

6. This may be brought to the notice of all concerned .

 

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCIT (OSD) (ITJ),
CBDT, New  Delhi

Share

Recent Posts

  • RBI

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to banks

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…

1 day ago
  • GST

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…

3 days ago
  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

6 days ago