Income Tax

Bank branch TDS deposited and return filed by zonal office. AO treated branch assessee in default

Bank branch TDS deposit and return filed by zonal office. AO treated branch as assessee in default. ITAT remanded matter to AO for verification

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2544 (2018) 09 ITAT

The appellant assessee was a branch of a Nationalised Bank. The bank branch had deducted the tax at source (TDS) on various payments made by it and transferred the same to its zonal office for remittance of the same to the account of Central Government in accordance with the policy adopted by the Bank at macro level to deposit all TDS from their respective zonal offices.

Subsequently, the zonal office filed its quarterly returns including the payments and TDS details of the said branch. However the bank branch too inadvertently filed its quarterly TDS returns using its Tax Deduction Account Number (TAN).

Coming to know about this duplicity, the bank branch later cancelled / revised its TDS returns which were filed already.

However, with repect to the bank branch, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that there were certain short deduction of TDS and accordingly, he treated the branch as assessee in default for the said shortfall u/s 201(1) of the Act and also charged interest thereon u/s 201(1A) of the Act.

This action of the AO was upheld by the CIT(A).

Aggrieved, the bank branch approach the Tribunal challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the fourth quarter of the relevant financial year.

The bank placed on record the latest statement of TDS downloaded from the TRACES wherein no demand was outstanding as on date for the relevant financial year.

The Tribunal opined that this aspect required factual verification and accordingly directed the AO to verify the fact as to whether the requisite TDS together with applicable interest, if any, had been duly remitted by the zonal office of the Bank including the transaction pertaining to the assessee branch herein.

The Tribunal clarified that if it is found to be correct, then the demand raised in the hands of the assessee should be cancelled.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Distinction between religious & charitable purposes is determined by institution’s primary or dominant object

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Fit case to issue notice u/s 148 – Relevancy of material & application of mind to objections important

For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO is under an obligation to assign reasons for rejecting explanation of the assessee

AO is under an obligation to duly consider the explanation furnished by the assessee and assign reasons for rejecting the…

1 day ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices under Postal Import Regulations, 2025.  Standard Operating Procedure…

1 day ago
  • civil-law

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, not void – SC

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, cannot be rendered void or inoperative merely for non…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No fault in serving notice to last known address when PAN data was not updated – ITAT

No fault in serving notice u/s 148 to last known address when assessee had not updated change of address in…

2 days ago