Income Tax

Bank branch TDS deposited and return filed by zonal office. AO treated branch assessee in default

Bank branch TDS deposit and return filed by zonal office. AO treated branch as assessee in default. ITAT remanded matter to AO for verification

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2544 (2018) 09 ITAT

The appellant assessee was a branch of a Nationalised Bank. The bank branch had deducted the tax at source (TDS) on various payments made by it and transferred the same to its zonal office for remittance of the same to the account of Central Government in accordance with the policy adopted by the Bank at macro level to deposit all TDS from their respective zonal offices.

Subsequently, the zonal office filed its quarterly returns including the payments and TDS details of the said branch. However the bank branch too inadvertently filed its quarterly TDS returns using its Tax Deduction Account Number (TAN).

Coming to know about this duplicity, the bank branch later cancelled / revised its TDS returns which were filed already.

However, with repect to the bank branch, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that there were certain short deduction of TDS and accordingly, he treated the branch as assessee in default for the said shortfall u/s 201(1) of the Act and also charged interest thereon u/s 201(1A) of the Act.

This action of the AO was upheld by the CIT(A).

Aggrieved, the bank branch approach the Tribunal challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the fourth quarter of the relevant financial year.

The bank placed on record the latest statement of TDS downloaded from the TRACES wherein no demand was outstanding as on date for the relevant financial year.

The Tribunal opined that this aspect required factual verification and accordingly directed the AO to verify the fact as to whether the requisite TDS together with applicable interest, if any, had been duly remitted by the zonal office of the Bank including the transaction pertaining to the assessee branch herein.

The Tribunal clarified that if it is found to be correct, then the demand raised in the hands of the assessee should be cancelled.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Excel Form 10E-Salary Arrears Relief calculator for AY 2026-27 for claiming rebate u/s 89(1)

Excel Form 10E-Salary Arrears Relief calculator AY 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) for claiming rebate under section 89(1) of Income Tax Act…

7 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

Procedure for handling returning export cargo from Strait of Hormuz, Waiver of additional fee

CBIC prescribes procedure for handling of returning export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition u/s 68 for cash deposit entries in bank statement upheld though assessee did not maintain books

Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act towards entries of cash deposit in bank statement upheld even though assessee…

20 hours ago
  • Concurrent Audit

Central Bank of India Concurrent audit online empanelment FY 2026-27. Last Date 15.03.2026

Central Bank of India Concurrent audit online empanelment for financial year 2026-27. Last Date for filing Online Applications is 15.03.2026…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Income tax nation-wide verification exercise on Restaurants suppressing turnover

Income tax Department carries out nation-wide verification exercise on Restaurants suppressing turnover As per Press Release issued by CBDT, Income…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Common business premise not enough to label loan creditor as accommodation entry provider

Merely because loan creditor existed in the premises wherein accommodation entry providers had their offices, AO cannot come to the…

4 days ago