GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
Notification No. 18/2016
New Delhi, the 17th March, 2016
S.O. 1146 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 2, read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (6 th Amendment) Rules, 2016.
(2) They shall come into force from the 1st day of April, 2016.
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, after rule 8A, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“8AA. Method of determination of period of holding of capital assets in certain cases.- (1) The period for which any capital asset, other than the capital assets mentioned in clause (i) of the Explanation 1 to clause (42A) of section 2 of the Act, is held by an assessee, shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of this rule.
(2) In the case of a capital asset, being a share or debenture of a company, which becomes the property of the assessee in the circumstances mentioned in clause (x) of section 47 of the Act, there shall be included the period for which the bond, debenture, debenture-stock or deposit certificate, as the case may be, was held by the assessee prior to the conversion.”
[Notification No. 18/2016][F.No.142/1/2016-TPL]
[Ekta Jain]
Deputy Secretary (Tax Policy & Legislation)
Note:- The principal rules were published vide notification number S.O. 969 (E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and last amended vide notification S.O.No.1101 (E), dated the 15th March , 2016
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…