Income Tax

CBDT revises jurisdiction of DIT Intelligence & Criminal Investigation Lucknow & Kanpur

CBDT amends jurisdiction of DIT(Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) Lucknow & Kanpur

MINSTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 5/2024 

New Delhi, the 6th June, 2024

S.O. 2209(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014, namely:-

In the said notification, in Schedule-II,-

(i) against Sl. No. 9, in column (4), the words, letters and brackets “in the State of Uttar Pradesh which
will be coterminous with the jurisdiction of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East)” shall be omitted;

(ii) against Sl. No. 10, in column (4), for the existing entries, the following entries shall be substituted,
namely: –

(4)

“(a) Areas within the limits of following revenue Districts (including any district carved out from these subsequently) of:

(i) Kanpur Nagar
(ii) Kanpur Dehat
(Ramabai Nagar)
(iii) Jalaun
(iv) Hamirpur
(v) Banda
(vi) Chitrakoot
(vii) Mahoba
(viii) Agra
(ix) Mathura
(x) Auraiya
(xi) Firozabad
(xii) Jhansi
(xiii) Lalitpur
(xiv) Etawah
(xv) Aligarh
(xvi) Farrukhabad
(xvii) Kannauj
(xviii) Etah
(xix) Hathras
(xx) Mainpuri
(xxi) Kanshiram Nagar
(xxii) Muzaffarnagar
(xxiii) Shamli
(xxiv) Saharanpur
(xxv) Meerut
(xxvi) Baghpat
(xxvii) Ghaziabad
(xxviii) Hapur (Panchsheel Nagar)
(xxix) Bulandshahr
(xxx) Gautam Buddh Nagar; and

(b) the State of Uttarakhand”

This notification shall come into force with effect from the 06th day of June, 2024.

[F. No. 187/6/2024 (ITA-I)]

VIKAS SINGH, Director (ITA-I)

Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II. Section 3, sub-section (ii), vide notification S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago