CBDT amends jurisdiction of DIT(Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) Lucknow & Kanpur
MINSTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
Notification No. 5/2024
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2024
S.O. 2209(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014, namely:-
In the said notification, in Schedule-II,-
(i) against Sl. No. 9, in column (4), the words, letters and brackets “in the State of Uttar Pradesh which
will be coterminous with the jurisdiction of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East)” shall be omitted;
(ii) against Sl. No. 10, in column (4), for the existing entries, the following entries shall be substituted,
namely: –
| (4) |
|
“(a) Areas within the limits of following revenue Districts (including any district carved out from these subsequently) of: (i) Kanpur Nagar (b) the State of Uttarakhand” |
This notification shall come into force with effect from the 06th day of June, 2024.
[F. No. 187/6/2024 (ITA-I)]
VIKAS SINGH, Director (ITA-I)
Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II. Section 3, sub-section (ii), vide notification S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014.
Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…
No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…
A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…
Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…
Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…
Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…