CBDT amends jurisdiction of DIT(Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) Lucknow & Kanpur
MINSTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
Notification No. 5/2024
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2024
S.O. 2209(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014, namely:-
In the said notification, in Schedule-II,-
(i) against Sl. No. 9, in column (4), the words, letters and brackets “in the State of Uttar Pradesh which
will be coterminous with the jurisdiction of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East)” shall be omitted;
(ii) against Sl. No. 10, in column (4), for the existing entries, the following entries shall be substituted,
namely: –
| (4) |
|
“(a) Areas within the limits of following revenue Districts (including any district carved out from these subsequently) of: (i) Kanpur Nagar (b) the State of Uttarakhand” |
This notification shall come into force with effect from the 06th day of June, 2024.
[F. No. 187/6/2024 (ITA-I)]
VIKAS SINGH, Director (ITA-I)
Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II. Section 3, sub-section (ii), vide notification S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014.
RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…
Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…
FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…
Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…
When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…
Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…